Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mass55th
They said the owners of the property that was being torn apart, would have to complain, before they acted. Could you imagine police watching robbers holding up a bank, and then saying they can't act unless the bank presses their alarm, to alert the police of their distress?
15 posted on 03/12/2003 12:11:00 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Pan_Yans Wife
"They said the owners of the property that was being torn apart, would have to complain, before they acted."

If they said that, then they are fools. If that was someone's car being vandalized, would they wait to do something until the owner filed a complaint? Their logic is BS. It's more than likely the police probably agreed with the perps and that is the reason they did nothing. If anything, these anti-war morons were littering, but of course they ignored that too. This had nothing to do with waiting for the property owner's complaint, and everything to do with the police looking the other way. If I'm not mistaken, they are required by law to act when they see the law being violated, and destroying decorations/memorial items on a person's private property is definitely vandalism and is a violation of the law. And as I mentioned before...littering.

27 posted on 03/12/2003 2:51:01 PM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson