To: NYC GOP Chick
Now she's trying to horn in on Santorum's time.
But I just heard her say "each and every life is important to me" and, and, to underscore her opinion that the government should never make such painful, personal, and intimate decisions for a woman, compared the PBA abortion ban to forced abortion in China.
Yeah, all life is important, except when the baby would constitute an "onerous burden" on the woman. So which is it, Hillary---are you seeking an exemption for the mother's health, or the woman's convenience?
To: hellinahandcart
My main problem with her argument is that it's not a "personal choice," but a barbaric practice.
But since I've chosen another senator to adopt in her place, I don't give a rat's ass about her any more. I still have to replace Putzhead, but he's not as loathsome as the battle-ax in the crusty pantsuit.
43 posted on
03/12/2003 12:10:51 PM PST by
NYC GOP Chick
(Clinton Legacy = 16-acre hole in the ground in lower Manhattan)
To: hellinahandcart
When does stabbing a baby's neck and sucking his little brains out save the life of the mother anyway? If they baby is all the way here except for the head, why not let the little guy or girl live?
To: hellinahandcart
If "each and every life" is sooooooooo important to Hitlery, why doesn't she advocate just completing the birth process in a partial birth abortion? Seems to me this would satisfy her desire for ridding a woman of an unwanted pregnancy, while providing a live baby for adoption by people who would love to adopt a child (cleft palate or not).
Oh .... what? ...... this is not about each and EVERY life being important?
Silly me. < / sarcasm >
55 posted on
03/12/2003 12:13:52 PM PST by
RightField
(the older you get ..... the older old is ......)
To: hellinahandcart
The only life that is important to this scab on the a$$ of humanity is one that can contribute MONEY to her worthlessness.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson