Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/12/2003 12:08:29 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: kattracks
"This bill doesn't protect the health of women. It puts our daughters in harm's way," countered Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Santorum's principal antagonist across three days of occasionally emotional debate.

I've got news for you Barbie, your son's are in harms way also when the abortionist sidles up to your birth canal with scissors and suction tube.

51 posted on 03/12/2003 5:48:28 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I'd like a list of the senators voting to affirm Roe v. Wade. In particular, I'm wondering about Zell Miller. I thought somebody on the other thread (the C-span thread) said that he had voted "no" on that. (If so, then it is especially amazing that Georgia seems fated to elect a pro-abort RINO to replace him!)
53 posted on 03/12/2003 8:26:06 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I still don't understand the focus on a specific procedure -- seems to me that it would make more sense to ban post-viability abortions except when the mother's life is in danger. And to Santorum's point, I think the doctor is the right person to judge viability (rather than the government).
54 posted on 03/12/2003 10:32:28 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson