Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/12/2003 12:08:29 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: kattracks
Rick Santorum for President in 2008!
2 posted on 03/12/2003 12:11:58 PM PST by Maeve (Siobhan's daughter and sometime banshee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus
Thank God Ping and BTTT
3 posted on 03/12/2003 12:13:02 PM PST by MattinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
I recall you thought that L'affaire Lott was just a way to ditch plans for this ban. Well, we ditched him and we got a PBA ban, too. Two strokes of good luck.
4 posted on 03/12/2003 12:14:28 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
BTTT
8 posted on 03/12/2003 12:19:05 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Santorum in 2008?
9 posted on 03/12/2003 12:20:28 PM PST by colorado tanker (beware the Ides of March)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Score one for decent, humane society.

Proud of Santorum and the Pubs today.

11 posted on 03/12/2003 12:23:14 PM PST by Stopislamnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TLBSHOW
Paging Show. Paging TLBSHOW. Looks like we won a round (though I won't count my votes before they're cast considering that this IS the Senate).
14 posted on 03/12/2003 12:27:31 PM PST by steveegg (Clinton and Blair didn't get UN authorization to launch Operation Desert (Kill Impeachment) Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Pro-Life bump!
15 posted on 03/12/2003 12:28:59 PM PST by k2blader (Please do not feed the Tag Lion. ®oar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The day's events reflected hardened political lines on abortion, an issue that Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., said was dividing America as deeply as slavery did in the 19th century.

Damn if the RATs ain't on the wrong side of history again.

16 posted on 03/12/2003 12:29:08 PM PST by steveegg (Clinton and Blair didn't get UN authorization to launch Operation Desert (Kill Impeachment) Fox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Another Bush promise met. This must be a bad day for Hitlery.
17 posted on 03/12/2003 12:32:25 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Bttt
18 posted on 03/12/2003 12:32:28 PM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I sure hope I'm not dreaming after reading this!
19 posted on 03/12/2003 12:33:37 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Discussion of Santorum on the Senate floor here
20 posted on 03/12/2003 12:37:46 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"This bill doesn't protect the health of women. It puts our daughters in harm's way," countered Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Santorum's principal antagonist across three days of occasionally emotional debate.

Wasn't it Santorum that was asking Boxer if a baby is still considered a fetus and can be killed if only the toe was still in the birth canal and Boxer just had no answer for that question? She absolutely refused to go on record with a yes or no answer.

This was about 4-5 years ago...anybody remember that?

23 posted on 03/12/2003 12:45:12 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I posted this two days ago, but thought it would work here as well:

Three times during Clinton's presidency PBA was passed by both houses, only to be vetoed at his desk. Somehow, I don't think it will be vetoed this time.

Go pop some popcorn, and get ready for the plaintive wails of the NAG crowd howling in their irrelevancy. In fact, it's about time that their precious "Constitutional Right" (which appears nowhere in the Constitution) saw some limits... preferably as many as there are to my Second Amendment rights, which are explicitly delineated, and more strongly-worded than any other expressly protected right. "Shall not infringe"!

24 posted on 03/12/2003 12:52:20 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Praying fervently that this gets passed quickly.
28 posted on 03/12/2003 1:00:43 PM PST by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
NJ has a ban on partial birth abortion, which Christie Whitless signed after at first vetoing the bill. Evidently there is wording that meets the Supreme Court's standards.
29 posted on 03/12/2003 1:02:26 PM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Would the Democrats perhaps filibuster this? Can they?
30 posted on 03/12/2003 1:08:18 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The legislation includes an exemption in cases in which the procedure is necessary to save the life of the mother.

In other words, it's another essentially worthless squandering of moral capital to accomplish nothing of substance.

33 posted on 03/12/2003 1:18:34 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
It puts our daughters in harm's way," countered Sen. Barbara Boxer

Since our daughters start in our wombs, Senator 'Vlad the Impaler' Boxer, all abortions put our daughters (and sons) in harm's way.

38 posted on 03/12/2003 1:57:14 PM PST by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson