Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
I posted this two days ago, but thought it would work here as well:

Three times during Clinton's presidency PBA was passed by both houses, only to be vetoed at his desk. Somehow, I don't think it will be vetoed this time.

Go pop some popcorn, and get ready for the plaintive wails of the NAG crowd howling in their irrelevancy. In fact, it's about time that their precious "Constitutional Right" (which appears nowhere in the Constitution) saw some limits... preferably as many as there are to my Second Amendment rights, which are explicitly delineated, and more strongly-worded than any other expressly protected right. "Shall not infringe"!

24 posted on 03/12/2003 12:52:20 PM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Teacher317
Yeah - the Senate was all for a ban on partial birth abortion when there was a Democrat for president - who vetoed their bill(s). Now that there's a Republican in office, those who voted to ban partial birth abortion before are all saying it's an okay thing now. Hipocrites.
27 posted on 03/12/2003 12:58:12 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson