Flight 800: Major breakthrough! Jack Cashill advises U.S. has conceded wrongdoing against Sanders

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, March 13, 2003 | Jack Cashill

[JohnHuang2]

Thursday, March 13, 2003

Quote of the Day by wayoverontheright

[Robert_Paulson2]

ruh roh... does this mean that the surface to air rocket was real, or that a shoe bomber did this and the clinton administration covered it up????

treasonous bastards...

[Stopislamnow]

Yes, short version please. Especially this late at nite.

[Pan_Yans Wife]

for later read

[Hunble]

WOW!!!!!!!!!!

[patriciaruth]

Did anyone else catch a BTW report on the shuttle Columbia that investigators found an orange substance on the debris, and had no idea what it was?

Everyone agrees the shuttle was up far too high when it started to come apart for a Stinger type missile to have hit it. But who else remembered that there was an orange substance on the Flight 800 debris?

Wonder if we'll get some answers now that the Bush administration seems to have opened the door.

[Hunble]

The short version:

Those of us that knew that something was wrong, put our evidence in a safe place.

When it becomes legal once again to expose the evidence, people like me will stand up.

[Captain Beyond]

This like the Billy Dale and The White House Travel office thing. I guess our government will give them the "Opps! Sorry we trashed you lives but stuff happens." apology with no one being held accountable for the screw up.

Question> Are the Clinton cronies still running the White House Travel Office?

[goldstategop]

Bump! You still can fight City Hall or in this case the Feds and win!

[mickie]

Later read.....

[sourcery]

So when are these government employee traitors going to be shot dead, in public, for treason against the people of the United States? Why aren't they in Federal prison, awaiting trial and execution? Why aren't you asking your Congressman and Senators these very same questions?

[TLBSHOW]

Bookmarked

[Hunble]

We did ask, but at least one Congressman that helped is now currently in prison.

[John H K]

Before the foil hat brigade begins masturbating with glee, I don't think a breathless, overly-dramatic article from World Crap Daily qualifies as reliable legal reporting.

The author is claiming that since some motion in some lawsuit supposedly wasn't replied to, to it means the Government is conceeding a bunch of assorted foil-hatter claims.

But the author isn't quoting government statements conceeding things, the author is quoting statements from the lawsuit filed by the foil-hatters and trying to make it look like the government is conceeding those things.

I'm very dubious that what the author is claiming is actually legally true.

And of course the author endorses stealing evidence from a government investigation, as well.

[Hunble]

You are most correct, and I will await the final legal verdict.

[.45MAN]

Great post John..(((ping dansangel)))

[dasboot]

The case against the investigation is very compelling...then there are all those reliable witnesses told they didn't see what they saw.

Sanders' actions and motivations are understandable and laudible, given that he witnessed the corruption and cover-up. I'd have done the same. (much to my own consternation)

No doubt the government will continue to cover up; the FBI can't afford yet another hit on its credibility...so it may be reasoned within the halls of Justice...in service to the "greater good". Bigger lies have been glossed, covered, and scapegoated away.

This is not to say that the FBI didn't have a noble purpose in shielding the public from the truth...but the truth is always better...warts and all.

Godspeed, Hunble.

[ThePythonicCow]

Yes, short version please.

I recently read First Strike: Twa Flight 800 and the Attack on America by Jack Cashill, James Sanders.

It presents a powerful case, with much detail, that TWA 800 was shot down by a couple of Navy missiles - in an failed effort to foil a terrorist attempt to bring that plane down. Clinton personally chose to cover it up, because apparently the truth, though well intentioned, would have been too risky just before the 96 election.

Part of story told involves a couple of reporters, named in this posting here, who got ahold of a sample of the residue of rocket fuel left on the seats, had it tested, and reported their findings. They were railroaded up one side and down the other.

They appear to be winning in their suit for damages resulting from the railroading. If this post is to be believed, and I for one would believe it, then the Federal government has chosen not to contest several key assertions in their case.

[GladesGuru]

Good try, but when the US Attorney didn't reply it is a de facto admission that there is no defense which will pass the red faced test.

The real question should be why our government tried to hide what many knew was a missle attack. If President Clinton did this to keep the public tranquil for an upcoming election, he vastly underestimated the public.

Remember Yamamoto's " -and filled him with a terrible rsolve."??

Or did President Clinton not want the public aroused against what he hoped would become his 'legacy' - a mid east deal?

[Woahhs]

And of course the author endorses stealing evidence from a government investigation, as well.

You have got to be kidding me. They staff you guys all three shifts?

The FBI had lifted samples in early September 1996, then refused to share the test results with the NTSB. For the record, those tests today remain classified under the guise of national security.

For a domestic plane crash...Hmmmm?