Flight 800: Major breakthrough! Jack Cashill advises U.S. has conceded wrongdoing against Sanders

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, March 13, 2003 | Jack Cashill

[exmarine]

This is all well and good but unless the major media or the Justice Dept. opens this back up, it all falls on deaf ears because apathetic oblivious Americans couldn't care less about it as long as their little personal world is not affected. Surely, you don't expect the corrupt and wicked FBI to investigate itself do you? I admire Cashill, Sanders and others who had the guts to expose this story, but I will be SHOCKED if it ever goes anywhere.

[LS]

I see now you must reply for each other. I must be doubly effective.

[acehai]

I thought you didn't have anything else to say to me, old thing...Oops...Re-reading your post, I guess you're correct...You haven't.

[Swordmaker]

Clever how you conveniently destroy any hope of getting the physical evidence that would prove your case.

Nothing clever about it. And i have "destroyed" nothing... I am just reporting the facts of the situation. Your snide remarks mean nothing.

I also said "outside range" of the shoulder fired variety... there are several models that WILL just barely reach that altitude. As to the missile and launcher found on Long Island, look it up yourself. TWA800.com has information on it.

[Swordmaker]

I see now you must reply for each other. I must be doubly effective.

Since you merely pick nits and have YET to respond to anything of substance, you are ineffective... completely.

You asked for radar showing indicta of a missile. We provided it. You respond by mis-characterizing the charts and examples to further your viewpoint. Twice I point out your error... but no response or recognition of the facts from you. You post patently false statements i.e. "plane below the horizon" and I show your declaration to be wrong... and you backpeddle and add irrelevent objections.

Why don't you back one of your assertions up with facts and math, for a change, instead of just making sweeping statements?

[LS]

Sorry, it's up to you guys to prove your case. I have nothing to prove. "My" version is the accepted fact. So please, provide your evidence.

[Swordmaker]

Sorry, it's up to you guys to prove your case. I have nothing to prove. "My" version is the accepted fact. So please, provide your evidence.

The evidence is where I pointed you. It has also been posted on FR several times. Do your own research. Right now, this thread appears to be just you, me, and acehai. He and I have read this evidence. Any effort on my part will just be seen by us three. It is not up to me to solve your ignorance.

I believe you stated in an earlier post that you had "researched" this topic for a chapter of a book you are writing... had you really done it, you would have seen these reports.