Flight 800: Major breakthrough! Jack Cashill advises U.S. has conceded wrongdoing against Sanders

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, March 13, 2003 | Jack Cashill

[acehai]

So when are these government employee traitors going to be shot dead, in public, for treason against the people of the United States? Why aren't they in Federal prison, awaiting trial and execution?

We're working on it! :^)

Why aren't you asking your Congressman and Senators these very same questions?

People are, as illustrated by: A reviewer, March 3, 2003, (Barnes and Noble's website)

Prepare to be Disturbed

This book prompted me to write my Senators and Bill O'Reilly. This is a comprehensive book about the facts of the Flight 800 tragedy that were systematically covered up by our government. You will know the truth about the attack that took down this jet by the time you complete this book. It is an incredible story and is backed up by solid facts. I could not put it down and I can't get it off my mind....

[LS]

Sorry dude. You are the missile man. Burden of proof is on YOU. Prove there are radar signatures. SHOW that the infamous "red residue" means something.

As for whining, you sound like a UFO guy. "See, you can't prove there were no radar signatures of UFOS so that proves they exist." Get a life, MR. DISINFORMATION YOURSELF.

[acehai]

you sound like a UFO guy. "See, you can't prove there were no radar signatures of UFOS so that proves they exist." Get a life,

Rule #4, and #5 again, pal...You're just digging your hole a little deeper

By their fruits, and all that, folks...;^)

[LS]

Quote your little "rules" all you want "pal." Bottom line, Mr. UFO, you have no evidence, and no case, and the radar proves it. If you had a radar signature of ONE missile, let alone TWO (as is required by the "red residue" theory), you would have produced it.

I guess it's put up or shut up. Do you have the radar proof?

[acehai]

Do you have the radar proof?

What would you do if I said I do? Call me a liar? Demand that it be produced on an open forum??? You cannot PROVE that I don't, "pal".

I ask again if you have looked at ALL the currently available radar data? I have. But if I do, you can rest assured it will be produced in my own good time, not yours.

You can call all the names you want, but the reader is free to ponder why all the shrill denials.

[Poohbah]

Good try, but when the US Attorney didn't reply it is a de facto admission that there is no defense which will pass the red faced test.

Wrong. What it means is that the US Attorney didn't reply. The US Attorney routinely refuses to reply to lawsuits filed by federal prisoners--and the prisoners never win.

[LS]

The only thing that is shrill is your repeated unwillingness to produce the ONE piece of evidence that would conclusively prove a missile beyond a shadow of a dowbt. But you can't, can you?

Because there is no such radar record, because there was no missile.

[acehai]

Because there is no such radar record, because there was no missile.

How d'ya know???

Keep repeating this litany long enough (flat on his back, kicking his heels on the floor;^)

You're sounding desperate here, chief...

[acehai]

Because there is no such radar record, because there was no missile.

I wasn't aware that shrillness and unwillingness were synonymous terms.

Your statement is expressed as an absolute. Therefore, I'll ask you again if you have seen ALL the available pertinent radar data concerning the events of July 17, 1996 involving TWA Flight 800. If you have not, my unwillingness to do your homework for you is moot. In such case you have no basis on which to make an absolute statement as fact: Your opinion, perhaps, but like belly buttons and @$$holes, we all have those.

Also, not meaning to be picky, but DOWBT=doubt...Just trying to help ya', old thing. Pip pip...

[LS]

I don't need to "do my homework." You are the one making the allegation. I don't have to "prove a negative."

This is a very simple test, Mr. "By their fruits." Show me the fruit. Show me the radar imaging of a missile. It solves the whole problem, case closed. If you have a radar image, it's a done deal. But YOU don't and (I suspect) you can't because no such radar image exists, or you would have produced it.

[LS]

No desperation whatsoever. And for your information, it's not a litany. It's a simple statement of fact. There is ONE fact that would prove the existence of a missile, and it ain't "red residue." It's a radar signature. Produce one.

[acehai]

It's a simple question, folks...Has LS seen ALL the pertinent available radar data in the TWA 800 matter???

He obviously has NOT. Otherwise he would say so.

He also is engaging in disinformation tactics by demanding data that he knows very well is sensitive.

[LS]

It's a more simple question than that, folks. If acehai HAD any evidence, WHATSOEVER, of any radar imaging, HE would produce it.

He can't. By HIS fruits you should know him. It is the quickest, and easiest way to prove his case. Yet he refuses to offer any evidence. Wonder why? Hmmmmmm.

[acehai]

Wonder why? Hmmmmmm.

Wonder why LS cannot or will not answer the question: Have you seen ALL the pertinent available radar data in the TWA Flight 800 affair? He could answer...But he won't. Why not??? Hmmmmm? If he answers in the negative, his argument falls apart of it's own weight. If he answers in the positive, then I have a few more questions...Just to check his temperature, y'unnerstan...;^)

[LS]

Wonder why acehai will not answer the simple imperative to PRODUCE THE RADAR. Why? Hmmm. There are no radar signatures of missiles.

He knows it. By his fruits . . . .

[FreedomPoster]

ping

[LS]

Key word is "May." I haven't ruled that out. What I want to see is the PROOF, which is EASILY ACCESSIBLE from the radar tapes. This ends the controversy, pure and simple. It shouldn't be a problem. So why hasn't anyone produced the radar evidence?