Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France Calls Emergency U.N. Meeting on Iraq's Peaceful Disarmament, Ignoring U.S. Deadline
Associated Press ^ | March 17, 2003 | Edith M. Lederer and Dafna Linzer

Posted on 03/16/2003 11:55:09 PM PST by Timesink

Mar 17, 2003

France Calls Emergency U.N. Meeting on Iraq's Peaceful Disarmament, Ignoring U.S. Deadline

By Edith M. Lederer and Dafna Linzer
Associated Press Writers

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - France called for an emergency U.N. ministerial meeting Tuesday to set a timetable for Iraq's peaceful disarmament, ignoring a Monday deadline set by the United States and three allies for the United Nations to authorize war against Baghdad.

U.N. chief weapons inspector Hans Blix was also ignoring the threat of a possibly imminent war for the moment and preparing to give the Security Council a 30-page report Monday listing about a dozen key remaining disarmament tasks that Iraq should complete in the coming months.

But 12 years after a U.S.-led coalition routed Iraqi forces from Kuwait, and 4 1/2 months after the Security Council gave Saddam a final opportunity to disarm, a showdown loomed in the 15-member council over the U.S. demand for U.N. backing to attack Iraq again.

It appeared almost certain that a U.S.-led war would have to go ahead without U.N. authorization because the Security Council remains bitterly divided and no acceptable compromise is on the table.

President Bush made it clear after a summit in the Azores Sunday with allies Britain, Spain and Portugal that diplomatic efforts would end by Monday night, but he did not make clear what the next steps would be.

Late Sunday evening, the Security Council scheduled closed consultations on Iraq at 10 a.m. EST Monday to discuss the resolution sponsored by the United States, Britain and Spain setting an ultimatum for Iraq to rid itself of weapons on mass destruction within days or face war. The current resolution would set the deadline for Monday, but U.S. officials said that could be extended briefly.

Washington could call for a vote, but the resolution doesn't have the support of a majority of the 15 council members and faces a threatened veto by France, and possibly Russia. At the summit, the cosponsors didn't offer any new "carrots" to try to win over opponents, and no major shifts in the positions of council members were expected.

The other option would be to abandon the resolution, which diplomats say might be the smarter thing to do from a legal point of view.

If the resolution is defeated, an attack against Iraq would violate international law. But if there is no vote, the legal status of a war falls into a gray area where the United States and Britain would likely claim they already have authority to attack under previous U.N. resolutions - and other council nations would argue that they don't.

Prime Minister Tony Blair said Sunday that British diplomats would work through the night to try to convince France to reverse course. Asked what would happen if Paris continues to threaten a veto, Blair appeared pessimistic about the chances of avoiding military action.

"It's very difficult to see how you can change that position," he told reporters during his flight home from the Azores.

French diplomats at the United Nations said the country's position had not changed, and it remains on the same track - in favor of continued inspections because they are working and opposed to any U.N. resolution authorizing military force.

For that reason, France pressed for a Security Council meeting at 3 p.m. EST Monday to discuss a joint declaration by France, Russia and Germany calling for foreign ministers from the 15 council nations to meet Tuesday to discuss Blix's key remaining disarmament tasks and agree on a "realistic" timetable for Saddam to disarm.

The declaration, released Saturday, said there was no justification for a war on Iraq and that U.N. weapons inspections were working.

French President Jacques Chirac said Sunday he was willing to accept a one-month or two-month deadline for Iraq to disarm, provided the move was endorsed by the chief U.N. weapons inspectors. But U.S. officials dismissed the idea as a nonstarter and Germany opposed it, saying it wanted no ultimatum.

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said he would continue to fight for peaceful disarmament.

"I think it is always worth it - even in the last minute - to push for peace and to fight for a peaceful disarmament," Schroeder told German television ZDF late Sunday.

Vice President Dick Cheney dismissed the French proposal, saying "it's difficult to take the French seriously."

After listening to the news conference in the Azores, Blix described the situation as "very threatening," but he made no plans to evacuate his weapons inspectors in Baghdad, saying he was watching the situation "hour by hour."

Instead, he said he would push forward with his work program and a list of key remaining disarmament tasks. According to U.N. officials familiar with working drafts of Blix's report, it envisions several more months of inspections, followed by a transition period to long-term monitoring of Iraq's weapons programs.

With the prospect of military action looming, Blix said he and Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief nuclear inspector, needed more information on what they could accomplish in Baghdad if they accept an invitation to visit Iraq.

"I don't exclude it but there are many other things that are happening in the world. ... We need a little more clarity," Blix said.

Iraqi Ambassador Mohammed Al-Douri said the invitation was aimed at fostering more cooperation with inspectors. But U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell doubted such a trip could produce results.

Speaking on CNN's "Late Edition," Powell said the remaining tasks Blix planned to identify were issues the "Iraqis could have resolved any time over the past five, 10, 12 years, and they have not. That's the problem."

AP-ES-03-17-03 0227EST


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: frogs; thefrench; un; unitednations; war; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Timesink
This is a french manuver. It is a way for them to say, "see we could have done this peacefully but the cowboy americans did not wait."

Since the french leak like a sink, I wonder if the war will start the second the diplomacy ends. Thus the french can add fuel to the antiamerican fires with complaints about mr. blix's efforts being curtailed against the will of the UN.

As weird as this sounds, I do not believe the UN should be trusted with a post war iraq.
61 posted on 03/17/2003 7:03:32 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto; All
everyone, please

THERE IS NO INTERNATIONAL LAW!

There are conventions, there are treaties, Even a book on international law will tell you there is no such animal.

The AP story is just fanning the USA vs the World leftist themes.

There was a thread about a journalism chat area were the journalist discuss this stuff. It was poynter or something. Probably some good inside infor there.
62 posted on 03/17/2003 7:08:00 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: DontMessWithMyCountry
These cannot be real humanoids.

You mean hemorrhoids?

63 posted on 03/17/2003 7:10:15 AM PST by TheBattman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
I say we just Veto them back into their irrelevance hole and press on with our terrorist termination tasks ?

Amen, Squantos. How are you, my friend?

MM

64 posted on 03/17/2003 7:17:48 AM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
France called for an emergency U.N. ministerial meeting Tuesday
The war may already be over by then, Jaques.
65 posted on 03/17/2003 7:28:46 AM PST by William McKinley (You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
After listening to the news conference in the Azores, Blix described the situation as "very threatening," but he made no plans to evacuate his weapons inspectors in Baghdad, saying he was watching the situation "hour by hour."

Just heard on the top of the hour news that Mr. Blix has reassessed the situation and has decided to pull up stakes from Iraq.

All I can say is, it's about time.

66 posted on 03/17/2003 7:28:53 AM PST by ksen (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: piasa
It may just be that the most effective way to keep Iraq from getting WMD would be for us to liberate France.

LOL!

67 posted on 03/17/2003 7:32:04 AM PST by ksen (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
You know, if this ends up getting us out of the UN, then the wait will have been worth it.
68 posted on 03/17/2003 7:38:56 AM PST by ksen (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: zook
I was just thinking that I'd like to have a link to that punk from "The Simpsons" who's always singing "Ha, ha!"

Ha Ha

His name is Nelson Muntz.

69 posted on 03/17/2003 7:47:25 AM PST by GallopingGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
Good and You ? When am I gonna be able to buy a more compact, easier to carry version of that story ?:o)

Stay Safe !

70 posted on 03/17/2003 7:55:06 AM PST by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: GallopingGhost

Click Here

71 posted on 03/17/2003 7:57:32 AM PST by GallopingGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
On Friday, the French surrender, unconditionally.

On Saturday, the French petition The UN to become an offical colony of Texas.

72 posted on 03/17/2003 7:57:43 AM PST by bigdog (eany,meany,miney,moe...look out now it's goin' to blow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
You mean hemorrhoids?

Haha. Very good ;-)

If only it were possible to immerse them in a big vat of Preparation-H (think that's what it's called), do you think we could make them disappear?!

73 posted on 03/17/2003 8:35:58 AM PST by DontMessWithMyCountry (It's serious business being an American in America these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Good and You ? When am I gonna be able to buy a more compact, easier to carry version of that story ?:o)

Fair, Squant. Had some bizarre medical symptoms a few days ago and have to go this afternoon for an MRI, MRA, Doppler ultrasound, etc. etc.

Should be finishing the revisions on the novel this week that my agent has asked for. After that, assuming he concurs that it's ready to go, the real marketing begins. The wheels of publishing turn slowly, though. If it sells to a publisher right away, it still wouldn't likely hit shelves until late 2004-2005. He's gonna push it hard as both book and movie, so we'll see. And in any event, rest assured you'll get an early copy!

MM

74 posted on 03/17/2003 8:39:11 AM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
French delegates assembled

75 posted on 03/17/2003 2:45:09 PM PST by Kay Soze (France - "Where the worms live above ground")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze
I thought it might be a photo from the Daschle family reunion.
76 posted on 03/17/2003 4:34:11 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson