Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to Focus on Palestinians After Saddam Is Gone
Reuters ^ | April 8, 2003 | Adam Entous

Posted on 04/08/2003 4:59:33 PM PDT by HAL9000

HILLSBOROUGH, Northern Ireland (Reuters) - President Bush promised on Tuesday to turn his focus to settling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict once Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was removed from power.

Bush held out the Northern Ireland peace process, spearheaded by British Prime Minister Tony Blair, as a possible model, saying he was "willing to spend the same amount of energy in the Middle East."

"The end of Saddam's regime will ... remove a source of violence and instability in the Middle East," Bush said after his third face-to-face meeting in less than a month with Blair, his main ally in invading Iraq.

At Blair's urging, Bush has promised to publish a so-called "road map" peace plan, which envisions creation of a Palestinian state by 2005, as soon as Palestinian lawmakers confirm a new cabinet under prime minister-designate Mahmoud Abbas, widely known as Abu Mazen.

Saying he was "pleased" with the selection, Bush told reporters after a two-day summit meeting: "I look forward to him (Abbas) finally putting his cabinet in place so we can release the road map."

The Israeli daily Haaretz reported on Tuesday that Arafat was undermining Abbas's bid to establish a government committed to reform and the premier-designate was considering pulling out rather than presenting his cabinet on Thursday as expected.

A senior Palestinian minister close to Arafat denied the report. "There are no pressures being exerted on Abu Mazen. Any talk about this is completely unfounded," Saeb Erekat said.

"Abu Mazen is still conducting consultations with Palestinian factions for the cabinet. He will present the cabinet to the Legislative Council (parliament) within the timeline granted to him by the Basic Law."

"VISION OF BROADER PEACE"

Europeans have welcomed U.S. professions of commitment to the road map, regarding it as a means to count anger in the Arab world over the U.S. and British invasion of Iraq.

But some analysts and diplomats have said they are skeptical of Bush's commitment to mediating between the Israelis and the Palestinians. They say Bush promised to release the road map as a favor to Blair, who faced stern opposition at home for backing Bush in Iraq.

Emboldened by progress in the war, Bush said both he and Blair were "determined to move toward our vision of broader peace in that region."

"We're committed to implementing the road map toward peace, to bring closer to the day when two states -- Israel and Palestine -- (live) in peace and stability," Bush said.

"Peace in the Middle East will require overcoming deep divisions of history and religion. Yet we know this is possible; it is happening in Northern Ireland," Bush added, citing Blair's efforts to breathe new life into the British-ruled province's flagging peace process.

"To those who can sometimes say that the process in the Middle East is hopeless, I say we can look at Northern Ireland and take some hope from that," Blair told reporters.

ISRAEL WANTS CHANGES

But Israel's new rightist coalition government, which has insisted that diplomacy cannot move forward until Palestinian attacks end, has already signaled its desire for modifications to the road map.

The Palestinians are expected to have fewer reservations about the peace plan than Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's government, some of whose members favor continued Jewish settlement in the West Bank.

Secretary of State Colin Powell has said Washington intends to promote the peace plan "as it is" without amendments by either side, but insisted it could not be forced on the parties.

Powell's comments appeared aimed at allaying European worries that Washington would give in to Israeli pressure for extensive changes, a process that could take months and probably anger an Arab world already incensed over the war on Iraq.

The road map calls for a series of reciprocal measures, including a halt to Palestinian violence and an end to Jewish settlement activity, to pave the way for a Palestinian state.

It was been in the works for almost a year but has been repeatedly delayed.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abumazen; arafat; belfastsummit; iraq; israel; palestinians; saddamhussein

1 posted on 04/08/2003 4:59:33 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Palestinian regime change??
2 posted on 04/08/2003 5:02:01 PM PDT by 3k9pm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Nope, appeasing the Saudis. There should be no linkage at all between Palestine and what is happening in Iraq. Palestine should not assume center stage again as it did after GWII. Arafat, who lived up Saddam's backside, should be made to sweat for a good long while....
3 posted on 04/08/2003 5:08:16 PM PDT by remitrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
This is all well and said but we best focus on the economy next and the problem in the Senate!
4 posted on 04/08/2003 5:09:07 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"... including a halt to Palestinian violence and an end to Jewish settlement activity, to pave the way for a Palestinian state."

No way!
5 posted on 04/08/2003 5:18:54 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberate Iraq! Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Those get my vote too. I think its possible to achieve a 55 seat majority in the Senate, which with the bluedogs makes it almost filibuster proof. Bush can celebrate by appointing Bork to the supreme court (if he weren't so darned old).

Daschle would then be profoundly and very, very deeply saddened. Heck, he'd probably need medical attention for cronic depression.

6 posted on 04/08/2003 5:19:54 PM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: remitrom
I think that if we dealt with Arafat by the same means we dealt with Saddam, at this point in time we'd still get 70% in favor of it. Just as Saddam made war against the Iraqis, so does Arafat against the Palis. We've found a damned good solution to this type of problem, and it would be a shame to return to the failed policies of the past.
7 posted on 04/08/2003 5:21:37 PM PDT by thoughtomator (I predict hysteria at the UN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Why in the hell isn't Arafat running for his life?

Seems to me that eventually someone, somewhere is going to look at the old goat and think to themselves:

"You know, me and the rest of my Palestinian buds are living like dogs. We suffer horribly, meanwhile Yassir has become rich on our backs. He turned down Barak's offer; nearly everything we wanted and stormed home to tell us to go and blow up our kids.. He's got a palace and millions socked away and his *too pretty* wife lives in France for crying out loud.. He's a bastard and if we ever want to have anything resembling peace then he's got to go.. He's had decades to get this right and he's f***** it up every time. Yassir is the problem."

8 posted on 04/08/2003 5:23:18 PM PDT by Jhoffa_ (Sammy to Frodo: "Yes, kiss me you fool!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3k9pm
Did he say northern Ireland??? As a possible model?????
9 posted on 04/08/2003 5:34:24 PM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Savage Beast
Maybe just from an energy expended perspective?
11 posted on 04/08/2003 5:37:14 PM PDT by 3k9pm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Bush to Focus on Palestinians After Saddam Is Gone"

He needn't bother rolling the tanks through Syria to "focus" on them, unless he wants to take the Syrians out on the way. A few Bradleys ought to do the trick.
Gaza is an ideal target for napalm. What fun that would be.
12 posted on 04/08/2003 5:42:56 PM PDT by VMI70 (...but two Wrights made an airplane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
Daschle would then be profoundly and very, very deeply saddened. Heck, he'd probably need medical attention for cronic depression.


The rats best start dressing for the stone age now!
13 posted on 04/08/2003 5:51:27 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Yes, the economy needs to be the top priority ASAP. I think some recent policy changes in the tech sector that will set the stage for that, but something needs to be done to kick it into high gear.
14 posted on 04/08/2003 5:53:47 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Hold that thought!
I just got me an idea.

Lets cut taxes!!
We'll give the money to the people who actually make the economy work!
We'll enable business owners to expand their businesses and hire more workers!!

What's that you say??
GWB already proposed that?? You sure??

Geez, that guy's on top of everything!!
15 posted on 04/08/2003 6:16:11 PM PDT by 3k9pm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 3k9pm
The only focus on terrorists should be through a reticle. They should be reabsorbed by the regimes who kept them isolated and fed on pathological hate.
16 posted on 04/08/2003 7:07:31 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Pardon my full metal jacket. Here's a steel tip for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson