To: mc10
This is so obvious, I can't be right. If we get out of the way and let NK take the south, after they mix in with all those folks who have been demonstrating against us, how the hell will NK use all that artillery or those nukes on the south without killing their own. Most important, how would NK be able to retailiate against us after we take out their nuke facilities? Their threats to start a war are gonna be much muted regardless, after they've seen what W has done to Irak.
I think you are right, for the most part. I have believed that the NK were already part of the people demonstrating against us. But more importantly, this does makes it easier for us to take out not only their nuclear facilities, but also their artillary and troops from the air if they try to do something against SK. With their massed formations, easy pickings.
30 posted on
04/09/2003 4:49:57 AM PDT by
GreatOne
(You will bow down before me, Son of Jor-el!)
To: GreatOne
"I have believed that the NK were already part of the people demonstrating against us."
I respectfully disagree with that statement. There has been a lot of kneejerk antiAmericanism here (Seoul) in the last year. Thankfully, IMHO, most of it is superficial. Frankly speaking, after all the crap I've had to listen to in the past year, I hope every last swinging *+!* is pulled out of here.
31 posted on
04/09/2003 5:05:49 AM PDT by
bucephalus
(30 miles from the DMZ)
To: GreatOne
i believe Rumsfeld just may be serious about this...as someone else just pointed out...this would take away a lot of kim's leverage...man, ain't it nice to have a bunch of "adult" patriots in charge
42 posted on
04/09/2003 9:04:00 AM PDT by
mc10
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson