Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wild Game
What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having a problem with?
This is the bottom line, no local, state or federal government has the authority to infringe on my God given right to possess any firearms.
And just so you know,I don't include an M1A2 Abrahms as being a firearm.
106 posted on 04/19/2003 7:54:43 AM PDT by Crusader21stCentury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Crusader21stCentury
What part of "shall not be infringed" are you having a problem with? This is the bottom line, no local, state or federal government has the authority to infringe on my God given right to possess any firearms.

Well, to be completely correct, the 2nd amendment doesn't mention firearms, but only arms. When it was passed, private ownership of cannon and even cannon armed warships, the "ultimate weapon" of the day, was not unheard of. That can be seen by the Constitution's grant of power to Congress to issue "letters of Marque and Reprissal". No point in being able to grant a "hunting license" (to hunt foreign ships) if no one can own a gun (in this case cannon armed privateers). Individuals often owned cannon too, although ownership by a town or township was more common.

247 posted on 04/19/2003 9:06:44 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson