No smoke without fire? No $h1t! ;-)
Mr. Galloway may think he can run as an 'independent'...but methinks his constituency will be a minority of ONE.
1 posted on
04/22/2003 7:25:01 PM PDT by
Happygal
To: MadIvan; sauropod; dighton; general_re
Ping.
BTW..me thinks Mr. Galloway got the Scots upset, and that hasn't happened since the last distillery ran dry! *LOL* (kiddin') ;-)
Please ping people who may find this interesting btw! *S*
2 posted on
04/22/2003 7:26:35 PM PDT by
Happygal
To: Happygal
3 posted on
04/22/2003 7:31:26 PM PDT by
Nick Danger
(The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
To: Happygal
""What is the motivation behind George Galloways visits to the Middle East, anyway?"
Let me see if I can explain it to ye, laddie,
£££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££££,
Now do ye ken?
To: Happygal
"Socialism? I havent used that word for years." No, the socialists avoid that term like the plague. They know it is a totally discredited political belief, so they hide under various other names like 'liberal' (in the US) and New Labor or New Democrat.
7 posted on
04/22/2003 7:46:24 PM PDT by
expatpat
To: Happygal
IF THE only thing worse than being talked about is not to be talked about at all, George Galloway might, in Oscar Wildes opinion, have had something to smile about yesterday. To continue the theme, Galloway has started libel proceedings against the Telegraph, a decision which may rank with Wilde's suing the Marquis of Queensbury for slander.
Wilde lost, even though Queensbury conceded that he knew the original slander, that Wilde was pretending to be homosexual, was false when he wrote it.
10 posted on
04/22/2003 7:59:23 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("From now on, every Christmas, we will remember a brave man called Jesus")
To: Happygal
Happygal, thanks for a great article! HAH, I can't wait for this guy to go down...is everyone buzzing about it?
18 posted on
04/22/2003 9:14:37 PM PDT by
ellery
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson