[dighton]

I'm sure there's some perfectly innocent explanation.

;-)

[MEG33]

Gee..does the VRWC work over there?

[Steven W.]

sure - pseudo-Americans John Conyers and Charles Rangle were the ones to actually engage in these payoffs from Saddam's regime and they disguised all this paperwork to cover up those facts and, instead, put all the burden on poor Galloway as the culprit. It's blashpeme they'll tell you!

[stands2reason]

The British newspaper The Guardian raised possible questions about the first round of documents, including the possibility that while the documents could be real, they might include false allegations from which Iraqi agents could profit internally.

Oh, but they're trying, they really are, to save their guy. Only on the left. Could you imagine WSJ sticking up for a Republican congressman the same way?

[cricket]

"I'm sure there's some perfectly innocent explanation."

. . .Scott Ritter says it is not so innocent; that he too has been a victim of Government 'smear campaigns'. . .