Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats plan filibuster against Texan Owen's nomination - GOP criticizes 'obstructionist' tactic
The Dallas Morning News ^ | April 30, 2003 | By TODD J. GILLMAN / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 04/30/2003 7:32:11 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2003 7:32:11 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yall


2 posted on 04/30/2003 7:33:38 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The dims are just jealous that none of their women are babes like this one...lol
3 posted on 04/30/2003 7:38:29 AM PDT by borisbob69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; nanny
Good post Mr. Meekster.

Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota said, "Her record is so egregious that we have no choice but to filibuster."

Nanny, you seemed interested in mean Republican racist tactics in the Estrada nomination so I thought this one might interest you as well.

4 posted on 04/30/2003 7:39:34 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (Just like Black September. One by one, we're gonna get 'em.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yall
Democrats said that when Democrat Bill Clinton was president, [A] Republicans blocked many nominees without resorting to a filibuster by invoking a rule that let one senator put an indefinite hold on nominations. They noted that [B] the Senate has confirmed all but three of Mr. Bush's 119 judicial nominees.

I bet that "A" & "B" is not true or is a distortion. Does anyone have the scoop on these statements ?
5 posted on 04/30/2003 7:41:30 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Fine. Let them filibuster. Just make them do it 24/7. This filibuster "lite" that the GOP is letting the dems get away with isn't working. Nobody is noticing. I want to see bobby byrd reading from the frickin' phone book!
6 posted on 04/30/2003 7:41:59 AM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; TLBSHOW; Grand Old Partisan
Many Senate Democrats wanted to filibuster against Mr. Sutton, too, Mr. Daschle said, "but we want to be selective. ... I don't want to abuse the practice of filibusters."

Daschle means, we're only going to filibuster people like Hispanics and women, because we would have a harder time opposing their appointment to the Supreme Court.

7 posted on 04/30/2003 7:43:20 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
She looks a lot like Mara Liason, NPR political reporter and house-liberal on Fox News Channel's Brit Hume's Special report show. You know, the one who's butt Fred Barnes kicks every other night.
8 posted on 04/30/2003 7:43:20 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: borisbob69
The dims are just jealous that none of their women are babes like this one...lol

Yep ! Here is the best they can offer (barf alert) . . .


hitler e. clintoon

9 posted on 04/30/2003 7:44:22 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Thank you, sir !
10 posted on 04/30/2003 7:44:51 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Where are the feminazis on this one? Pro Business? Good gosh that is the best reason they have?
11 posted on 04/30/2003 7:47:00 AM PDT by Reagan79 (Update at Asbury Seminary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Daschle had been exposed about the filibuster plan of all Judges and so he needed to try and show he wasn't trying to filibuster everyone.
12 posted on 04/30/2003 7:48:26 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I haven't seen them fillibuster anyone yet. We just keep letting them obstruct...MAKE THEM DO A REAL FILLIBUSTER.

Frist is Lott "lite".

13 posted on 04/30/2003 7:49:00 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Gadzooks!! Is that a real picture? I almost had a projectile vomiting event in my office when that creature reared her ugly head. And it is not like she "bloomed" when she got older, but at least they seemed to rein in those teeth. The term "snaggletoothed" comes to mind!
14 posted on 04/30/2003 7:51:16 AM PDT by SpinyNorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
Any lawyer please respond:

Since the constitution is quite explicit on the role of the Senate to advise and consent and vote on judical nominations, is there a valid case that could be taken to the Supreme Court that the Parlimentary rules of the Senate are unconstitutional? Under the present rules it takes a
super majority, 60% to break the fillibuster and get a vote.
The constitution requires a simple majority 50% to confirm the nomination. In effect the fillibuster is changing the required percentage as defined in the constituion to confirm a nominee.
15 posted on 04/30/2003 7:53:10 AM PDT by cpdiii (RPH & oil field trash and proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
President Bush is way ahead of the democrats. He will flood them with nominees. If they confirm no one, they will be in big trouble in the 2004 elections for irresponsible obstructionism. If they confirm only white males on the idea that women and hispanics would be tough to oppose for the US Supreme Court, that looks terrible too. If they confirm some, while obstructing others who have equally good or better credentials, they also take a hit. Consider the 2004 elections: Bush and the Senate Republicans go into it with strong national security credentials, advocacy of tax cuts, reform of social security, all winners. Democrats go in having obstructed all of them, and no other issue to offer.
16 posted on 04/30/2003 7:54:35 AM PDT by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
She looks a lot like Mara Liason . . .

I hadn't thought of it, but you're right. There is a resemblance . . .



17 posted on 04/30/2003 7:58:47 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Priscilla Owen bump!

(The dims are at it again!)

I hope the GOP uses this [the democratic obstructionism] in the 2004 campaigns!
18 posted on 04/30/2003 8:00:47 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
YES! YES! YES!!! When in the hell are the Republicans going to REALLY play hardball instead of this mamby-pamby way that Frist has been handling the judicial nominations. I want to see the Democrats sleeping on cots for a few weeks.
19 posted on 04/30/2003 8:01:49 AM PDT by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thucydides
I'm with you. A repeat of 2002 with the 'RATS losing even more seats in the House and Senate !

Plus Bush gets re-elected.

20 posted on 04/30/2003 8:03:21 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson