Skip to comments.
Senator Says Bush Pushing Too Hard for Tax Cut
Reuters ^
| Sat May 3, 2003
| Reuters t
Posted on 05/04/2003 7:29:27 PM PDT by dgallo51
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Why isn't anyone talking about boycotting "Made in Vermont" maple syrup? With Pat Leahy and Jumpin' Jim as Senators, they must be FRENCH!
1
posted on
05/04/2003 7:29:27 PM PDT
by
dgallo51
To: dgallo51
I have been boycotting Vermont maple syrup since Jumpin' Jim Jeffords jumped! Would hate to have Leahy and Jeffords as my two Senators! UGH!
2
posted on
05/04/2003 7:31:39 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US)
To: PhiKapMom
3
posted on
05/04/2003 7:34:13 PM PDT
by
annyokie
(provacative yet educational reading alert)
To: dgallo51
that the nation's children and grandchildren will eventually have to pay back.It was only a few years ago they were talkiing about hhow to use the surplus! All this talk about the long-term is nonsense. The only that that is certain is that the social security system cannot continue on its present basis.
4
posted on
05/04/2003 7:34:40 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: dgallo51
It's time to trade Vermont for Alberta.
To: dgallo51
It's called "leadership", Jumping Jim, not "pushing too hard". But then, you wouldn't be able to recognize it as such anyway.
6
posted on
05/04/2003 7:39:00 PM PDT
by
exit82
To: dgallo51
Juck Feffords.
To: dgallo51
Reuters is a joke. We're not "FINANCING TAX CUTS WITH DEBT", as they say, we're financing government spending with debt. Any moron who understands where taxes come from and where spending comes from understands the difference. Mental pygmies.
8
posted on
05/04/2003 7:46:40 PM PDT
by
tomahawk
To: dgallo51
I wonder if the management at the local stores have arguments about how they're going to "pay for" a sale? After all, if the company normally sells 100 widgets/day for $100 and it cuts the price to $80 for a week, it will lose at least $2,000/day, and possibly much more if people decide to buy more than the usual number of widgets.
9
posted on
05/04/2003 7:47:17 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: dgallo51
BTW, why does nobody ask if the country can afford to keep sending so much money to Washington?
10
posted on
05/04/2003 7:48:00 PM PDT
by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: dgallo51
Jeffords jumped because he finally figured out that the Republican party was no longer the party of snotty rich liberals as opposed to the Democratic party which is the party of snotty middle class and poor liberals. He apparently missed the whole "A Choice, Not an Echo", Goldwater era and the Reagan Revolution.
11
posted on
05/04/2003 7:50:58 PM PDT
by
dwswager
To: supercat
Jeffords commenting on a tax cut.....LOL
You never see real fear in the eyes of a liberal like you do when you say the words "tax cut!"
The taxes belong to the people. Taxes are necessary to run the government. But there are too many unnecessary government programs designed for no other reasons than to get votes and they should be terminated and the money returned to the people from which it came.
12
posted on
05/04/2003 7:51:31 PM PDT
by
Cameron1
To: dgallo51
I'd like to tell Mr. Jeffords what he can push too hard...
To: Paul Atreides
If Dubya doesn't get the economic stimulus package he asks for, how can he be blamed for the economy? If I were him, I would scream to the hilltops every day that the economic stagnation belongs to the ANTI stimulus Senators that are blocking my plan. If he is blocked at every turn, how can he take the blame?
14
posted on
05/04/2003 8:05:03 PM PDT
by
chuckles
To: Paleo Conservative
It's time to trade Vermont for Alberta.With a Massachusetts kicker.
15
posted on
05/04/2003 8:08:29 PM PDT
by
geedee
(The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
To: dgallo51
Remember this, if you used the accounting practices of the US Government, you would be serving time for multiple felonies.
I just wish once some on say, budget, start from scratch, no base line, and do a real effing budget.
16
posted on
05/04/2003 8:13:35 PM PDT
by
dts32041
(The power to tax, once conceded, has no limits; it continues until it destroys.- RAH)
To: dgallo51
When a liberal attacks Bush, it shows up as a Reuters "news" story. When a liberal speaks out on anything, it shows up as a Reuters "news" story. When liberals lie, cheat, steal, beat their wives, take bribes, get sloshed in public, impregnate teenaged girls, sell nuclear secrets, commit rape, wave their plumbing at their employees, stick a cigar where the sun don't shine or incinerate a church, the story will be suppressed in Reuters.
I theeenk there is a pattern here.
17
posted on
05/04/2003 8:14:16 PM PDT
by
T'wit
To: Paleo Conservative
I'll drink to that!
18
posted on
05/04/2003 8:16:19 PM PDT
by
dgallo51
To: Mean Daddy
I'll drink to that too!
19
posted on
05/04/2003 8:17:04 PM PDT
by
dgallo51
To: tomahawk
What? You expect Reuters to employ business writers with an understanding of Capitalism and Economics? What a novel concept!
20
posted on
05/04/2003 8:18:36 PM PDT
by
dgallo51
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson