Interesting sweeping generalization. Care to mention specific examples of unreliable sources on Antiwar.com? While you are at it, perhaps you can also mention which articles are poorly written?
Last time I checked, Antiwar.com reports from a variety of sources, both biased and neutral, but certainly more diverse than most of our network media, like FauxNews, the choice propaganda news channel of the illiterati.
Antiwar.com commentaries are not neutral, but most of them are superbly written and documented, and far, far from anything close to despicably poor prose of sweeping generalizations that personify some characters on this forum.