Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1Old Pro
I think the photo also shows 229 kph.

oops, 222

78 posted on 06/19/2003 7:16:03 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (The Dems are self-destructing before our eyes, How Great is That !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: 1Old Pro
I think the photo also shows 229 kph.

oops, 222

In my old riding days in England in the 1960s, *running the ton* [100MPH] was the usual common goal. If that sounds pretty tame compared to some of the numbers so casually kicked around elsewhere in this post, note that such burnouts usually happened after the bike's operators were finished with a day's work and tired, in English weather, at night, and with traffic on London's North Circular Road that included lumbering goods lorries just ahead...and on bikes that were *daily drivers* with little more protective gear other than a leather jacket and *maybe* a *puddin' bowl* helmet of that time period.

Now the number has grown a bit, switched over to the metric way of doing things too. Instead of the magic *ton* the mark to shoot for is now *deuces*- 222 KPH.

Been there, done that. Didn't fall off, so I'm still around to talk about it.

-archy-/-

102 posted on 06/19/2003 9:46:18 AM PDT by archy (Keep in mind that the milk of human kindness comes from a beast that is both cannibal and a vampire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson