Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH VOWS TO FIND WMD'S
Sky News ^ | June 21, 2003

Posted on 06/21/2003 1:11:26 PM PDT by neccen

President Bush has reaffirmed his determination to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

In his weekly radio address, Mr Bush also warned US forces in Iraq face a future of "danger and sacrifice" before the country is secure.

He was speaking as politicians in Washington began to examine whether the intelligence about Iraq's weapons capability was exaggerated in the run up to the war.

The lack of evidence months after Baghdad fell to coalition forces has caused major political problems for Tony Blair and to a lesser extent the Bush administration.

Mr Bush said: "Military and intelligence officials are interviewing scientists with knowledge of Saddam Hussein's weapons programmes and are pouring over hundreds of thousands of documents.

"All who know the dictator's history agree that he possessed chemical and biological weapons and that he used chemical weapons in the past.

"We are determined to discover the true extent of Saddam Hussein's weapons programmes, no matter how long it takes."

He added: "Dangerous pockets of the old regime remain loyal to it and they, along with their terrorist allies, are behind deadly attacks designed to kill and intimidate coalition forces and innocent Iraqis."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coverup; hoax; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: evad
I would say let 'em stay on board. Maybe they would try to argue, maybe learn something. What they posted wasn't that bad IMHO.
41 posted on 06/21/2003 5:25:08 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Breaking down the stereotypes of soccer moms everyday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething
I would say let 'em stay on board. Maybe they would try to argue, maybe learn something

Agreed. I can't see from what few remarks he made why he was banned..or suspended..or whatever happened to him.

42 posted on 06/21/2003 5:34:24 PM PDT by evad (Lying..It's WHAT they do, it's ALL they do and they WON'T stop...EVER!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: evad
I think it hurts us more than helps us. Sometimes people can be swayed with facts presented in a rational manner. I was all ready to debate. Oh well.
43 posted on 06/21/2003 5:39:49 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Breaking down the stereotypes of soccer moms everyday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Filibuster_60
I did read Will's column. I don't understand why you all can't give this administration time. We've been looking for these things for 2 months. The inspectors had 12 years, and Saddam was still playing mind games with anyone willing to listen last year, when Bush was building up forces in the Gulf. Saddam had the responsibility to prove he had destroyed everything he had. BTW, I appreciate and am thankful for the 200 sacrifices made in Iraq. Those brave men and women joined the armed forces knowing they might be asked to make those sacrifices. Why don't you go ask the families of 3000 innocents what they think of pre-emptive strikes?
44 posted on 06/22/2003 4:48:08 AM PDT by Jodi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson