[Principled]

Incredibly an honest observer would have to admit its starting to look like Scott Ritter was right.

You mean he was right when he was saying the weapons were there? Or do you mean he was right when he did an about face (at the same time Saddam give him $400,000) and suddenly said saddam has no weapons???

[Jorge]

"Incredibly an honest observer would have to admit its starting to look like Scott Ritter was right."

You mean he was right when he was saying the weapons were there? Or do you mean he was right when he did an about face (at the same time Saddam give him $400,000) and suddenly said saddam has no weapons???

Any honest observer would have to say Scott Ritter is a two faced phoney who has no credibilty regardless of how this turns out.

Of course Scott Ritter also warned us about the great loyality of Iraqis to Saddam who supposedly would fight so bravely that the American military would run from Iraq with it's "tail between it's legs".

Scott Ritter couldn't have been MORE wrong if he tried.
Yet I saw him on TV a few weeks ago claiming that he was right and that we lost the war. LOL