Skip to comments.
Custodian Trashes Library Art Exhibit ("art" mistaken for garbage)
AP (via Yahoo) ^
| 06/24/03
Posted on 06/24/2003 8:56:17 AM PDT by Drew68
Custodian Trashes Library Art Exhibit
Tue Jun 24, 8:25 AM ET
BOULDER, Colo. - It's art to some, yes, but apparently not to the custodian who threw away the newest exhibit at the Boulder Public Library.
After being pulled out of the garbage, "My Favorite Place to Walk in Boulder: Or Found Trash Objects" officially opened Friday at the downtown library. The display features common trash found by University of Colorado art students in otherwise scenic spots citywide.
"This is a slightly different kind of art," said Karen Ripley, director of cultural programs. "It's not meant to be beautiful.
"One of the comments our maintenance guy made was that it smells," said Ripley, who saved the artwork.
She said the odor could have been coming from a soggy brown leather clog found in a drinking fountain.
When the janitor dumped the display, there were no signs or barriers to indicate it was anything but what it looked like: a pile of rubbish, Ripley said.
Intended as a social commentary on ecology, the exhibit includes a green Frisbee, a plastic cookie cutter, a cigarette package and a drink coaster.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: art; boulder; libraries; modernart; trash
Only in Boulder, the Berkeley of the Rockies.
1
posted on
06/24/2003 8:56:19 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: Drew68
BWA HA HA HA HA!! Classic!
They should give the guy a raise for taking out the trash.
2
posted on
06/24/2003 8:59:19 AM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: Drew68
"Hmmm-- this looks like trash. It smells like trash. Why... it must be trash."
~giggle~
~snort~
BWA HAHAHAHAHA!!
3
posted on
06/24/2003 9:01:18 AM PDT
by
Clara Lou
To: Drew68
Oh? Do any of you really think you can tell art from trash? Why not take
THIS QUIZ and find out.
(By the way, I failed.)
4
posted on
06/24/2003 9:07:14 AM PDT
by
PaulJ
To: Drew68
What a really cute story. The janitor understands art, clearly, more than the art students.
However, an art professor that I know entered in an art show a small piece of galvanized pipe sitting on a pedestal. It looked like junk, but he had rigged lights, paintings and mirrors inside the pedestal, so that if you put your eye up to it and looked in the open end of the pipe, you saw an illusion of blue sky, and thought the pipe went through the pedestal, under the floor and outdoors, like a periscope, giving you a view outside the building.
5
posted on
06/24/2003 9:09:09 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: PaulJ
Ha! I failed it too. I kind of drew the line at that Michael Jackson monstrosity. Plus I consider much of the carefully designed stuff like office chairs to be legitimately artistic, as do, I'm sure, their designers (and those who employ the designers).
I guess the person who wrote the quiz only thinks it's art when some idiot attaches a "social" meaning to it.
6
posted on
06/24/2003 9:17:19 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: PaulJ
Me too. Got em all wrong.
To: PaulJ
The problem with this quiz is that it didn't have the choice of "both art AND crap". I'm almost embarrassed to say I got a 12 of 16 correct.
8
posted on
06/24/2003 9:32:45 AM PDT
by
LexBaird
To: Drew68
A similar thing happened here in Atlanta awhile ago.
When "modern art" was being installed over at the Richard Russell Federal Building, a janitor threw away what he thought was an old, torn, paint-spattered dropcloth.
Turned out it was a $100K "work of art" waiting to be installed on the wall. The artist was furious. Everybody else laughed -- until we realized that it was OUR tax money paying for the boondoggle.
AFAIK, the stupid thing is still hanging on the wall over there. No matter what the artist says, it's just an old, torn, paint-spattered dropcloth.
9
posted on
06/24/2003 9:40:40 AM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . there is nothing new under the sun.)
To: Drew68
"This is a slightly different kind of art," said Karen Ripley, director of cultural programs. Oh, gosh. A Dadaist, found art social statement piece of work extolling us not to litter. How original.
To: PaulJ
I got a "not bad"...10/16. I cheated tho, I picked the stuff that I thought was crap and chose art....bwahahaha1
FMCDH
11
posted on
06/24/2003 10:18:30 AM PDT
by
nothingnew
(the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
To: AnAmericanMother
LOL! followed by a sigh of resignation.
12
posted on
06/24/2003 10:54:13 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: LexBaird
I just couldn't make myself vote yes on some of the stuff, even though I was pretty sure it was going to be labeled as art.
13
posted on
06/24/2003 11:19:35 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: AnAmericanMother; Drew68; All
14
posted on
06/24/2003 11:34:45 AM PDT
by
dighton
(NLC™)
To: Drew68
"This is a slightly different kind of art," said Karen Ripley, director of cultural programs. "It's not meant to be beautiful. Yes, only "slightly different". If you really wanted a different kind of art these days, try making something beautiful. That seems to be right out with most modern artists.
To: Drew68
Ok, I now think Patsy is innocent. JonBenet committed suicide when she realized that she would grow up in such a screwed-up city.
16
posted on
12/15/2007 5:49:46 PM PST
by
Ignatz
(There's no place like 127.0.0.1....there's no place like 127.0.0.1....)
To: nothingnew
I got “not bad, 11/16, you’ve been to an opening or two.” Well, no. But I was trying.
17
posted on
12/15/2007 6:08:32 PM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
To: Drew68
If it was “mistaken”, then it wasn’t a mistake.
18
posted on
12/15/2007 6:11:31 PM PST
by
djf
(I'm too busy to be jolly. Tis the time to cook a collie!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson