To: jethropalerobber
You are mandating amorality. You take it further and call for the public condemning of morality as it has been defined for as long as history has been recorded. These words aren't that tough to define unless your name is Bill Clinton.
1,227 posted on
06/26/2003 2:26:36 PM PDT by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: RAT Patrol
You are mandating amorality. exactly how is this scotus decision forcing you to engage in behavior you find immoral?
To: RAT Patrol
"You are mandating amorality. "
That's funny. How does this decision force you to do anything you consider immoral? Are you suddenly going to be forced to perform homosexual acts? How silly.
To: RAT Patrol
"You are mandating amorality. "
That's funny. How does this decision force you to do anything you consider immoral? Are you suddenly going to be forced to perform homosexual acts? How silly.
To: RAT Patrol
"You are mandating amorality. "
That's funny. How does this decision force you to do anything you consider immoral? Are you suddenly going to be forced to perform homosexual acts? How silly.
To: RAT Patrol
"You are mandating amorality. "
That's funny. How does this decision force you to do anything you consider immoral? Are you suddenly going to be forced to perform homosexual acts? How silly.
To: RAT Patrol
You are mandating amorality. You take it further and call for the public condemning of morality... That is absolutely ridiculous. Just when I think the logical contortions can't get any more disingenuous...
No one is mandating amorality. You're free to be as moral as you please.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson