Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
Getting the government to pass a law against nose picking is NOT the way this country is set up to run.

Should the SCOTUS void a states anti-nose picking law, hypothetically? Or do states have the right to pass silly laws?

587 posted on 06/26/2003 10:02:56 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Ohio Chapter. Original White Devil for Sharpton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies ]


To: dubyaismypresident
Should the SCOTUS void a states anti-nose picking law, hypothetically? Or do states have the right to pass silly laws?

SCOTUS really should have that "Stupid, but Constitutional" ink stamp.

621 posted on 06/26/2003 10:12:50 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
Should the SCOTUS void a states anti-nose picking law, hypothetically? Or do states have the right to pass silly laws?

Yes. The only legit function of government is protection of individual Rights. While my neighbors nostril farming my be disgusting to me, it in no way infringes on my Rights. Especially when the law specificly states that it is OK for brown haired people to pick their noses, but not redheads.

700 posted on 06/26/2003 10:34:01 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson