Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RRWCC
Article III, section 2, paragraph 2
"...the court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make."

I didn't know that. Live and learn! Could Congress take the initiative on a matter like homosexual marriage, and exclude cases on that subject from the federal courts? If the court really thinks a question of constitutional rights is involved, could it overturn the Congress's exclusion of the matter from its jurisdiction?

25 posted on 07/02/2003 1:20:33 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: x
"could it overturn the Congress's exclusion of the matter from its jurisdiction?"

No it could not. There is no Constitutional provision for the court to do so. The judges are appointed NOT elected. It was the founders intention that THE PEOPLE control the government.

I doubt very seriously if you could find enough legislators with the courage to do this though.
26 posted on 07/07/2003 6:15:25 AM PDT by RRWCC (Even under a good king, a subject is still a subject.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson