[stryker]

But your suggestion was that he was sentenced so harshly because he might infect someone with a disease. You cannot slip away from faulty reasoning so slyly.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

I think I was drifting there. What I should've said was that he got the sentence for the crime he committed. The reason that the sentence is unusually harsh is because he could've been trying to kill the officer. Just because a disease hasn't turned up yet, doesn't mean he doesn't have one and should be shown leniency by the court.