Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tomahawk
If he would not defend marriage after the SCOTUS says same sex marriages are not okay, then I will leave.

Why can't you take his approach and wait and see on this. Let's not go nuts yet.

If necessary, an amendment will be put forward, hopefully including a limitation on SCOTUS power as well.
16 posted on 07/02/2003 4:08:14 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: rwfromkansas
an amendment has been put forward HJ 56 in the house. May 21, 2003. It is necessary.
233 posted on 07/03/2003 8:32:11 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: rwfromkansas
If necessary, an amendment will be put forward, hopefully including a limitation on SCOTUS power as well.

Oh, that's a real good idea. Let's change the fundamental structure of our system because the SCOTUS handed down a decision you don't like. That's real conservative! That smacks of FDR's court packing scheme.

257 posted on 07/07/2003 3:54:35 AM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson