Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Birth Rate Reaches Record Low [why have the women given up?]
HHS | June 2003 | Centers for Disease Control

Posted on 07/09/2003 5:36:49 PM PDT by ex-snook

U.S. Birth Rate Reaches Record Low
Births to Teens Continue 12-Year Decline; Cesarean Deliveries Reach All-Time High

For Immediate Release
Wednesday, June 25, 2003

The U.S. birth rate fell to the lowest level since national data have been available, reports the latest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) birth statistics released today by HHS Secretary Tommy G. Thompson.  Secretary Thompson also noted that the rate of teen births fell to a new record low, continuing a decline that began in 1991.

The birth rate was 13.9 per 1,000 persons in 2002, a decline of 1 percent from the rate of 14.1 per 1,000 in 2001 and down 17 percent from the recent peak in 1990 (16.7 per 1,000), according to a new CDC report, “Births: Preliminary Data for 2002.”  The current low birth rate primarily reflects the smaller proportion of women of childbearing age in the U.S. population, as baby boomers age and Americans are living longer.

There has also been a recent downturn in the birth rate for women in the peak childbearing ages.  Birth rates for women in their 20s and early 30s were generally down while births to older mothers (35-44) were still on the rise.  Rates were stable for women over 45.

Birth rates among teenagers were down in 2002, continuing a decline that began in 1991. The birth rate fell to 43 births per 1,000 females 15-19 years of age in 2002, a 5-percent decline from 2001 and a 28-percent decline from 1990. The decline in the birth rate for younger teens, 15-17 years of age, is even more substantial, dropping 38 percent from 1990 to 2002 compared with a drop of 18 percent for teens 18-19 years.

“The reduction in teen pregnancy has clearly been one of the most important public health success stories of the past decade,” Secretary Thompson said. “The fact that this decline in teen births is continuing represents a significant accomplishment.”

More than one fourth of all children born in 2002 were delivered by cesarean; the total cesarean delivery rate of 26.1 percent was the highest level ever reported in the United States. The number of cesarean births to women with no previous cesarean birth jumped 7 percent and the rate of vaginal births after previous cesarean delivery dropped 23 percent.  The cesarean delivery rate declined during the late 1980s through the mid-1990s but has been on the rise since 1996.

Among other significant findings:

bullet graphicIn 2002, there were 4,019,280 births in the United States, down slightly from 2001 (4,025,933).

bullet graphicThe percent of low birthweight babies (infants born weighing less than 2,500 grams) increased to 7.8 percent, up from 7.7 percent in 2001 and the highest level in more than 30 years.  In addition, the percent of preterm births (infants born at less than 37 weeks of gestation) increased slightly over 2001, from 11.9 percent to 12 percent.

bullet graphicMore than one-third of all births were to unmarried women.  The birth rate for unmarried women was down slightly in 2002 to 43.6 per 1,000 unmarried women, reflecting the growing number of unmarried women in the population

bullet graphicAccess to prenatal care continued a slow and steady increase.  In 2002, 83.8 percent of women began receiving prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy, up from 83.4 percent in 2001 and 75.8 percent in 1990.

Data on births are based on information reported on birth certificates filed in State vital statistics offices and reported to CDC through the National Vital Statistics System.  The report is available on CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics Web site.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; birthrate; catholiclist; cdc; children; hhs; motherhood; populationcontrol; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-299 next last
To: Alberta's Child
That was a joke, right?

I could not be more serious.

And if you don't see the truth of what I said, you are missing the most important realization of your life.

Have you ever driven from one end of this country to the other?

Funny, but immigrants fleeing a crowded Europe and surplus Americans fleeing the crowded East Coast of America, settled what is now the continental United States from coast to coast within a lifespan--using horses and steam locomotives to move themselves there.

Things were already so crowded in the nineteenth century that pioneers were willing to risk being killed by indians or wildlife to find a place to settle.

All the best places, mostly along the coastline, were already taken.

You think it's gotten roomier since?

You think you have to suffer under pollution controls and regulations, under recycling, under countless laws that in effect say now it's your turn, then stop, now it's their turn--because we have so much room?

You can just go out in the woods and shoot as many game animals as you'd like?

If America has so much available space, why is real estate so expensive?

And why is the country becoming more and more liberal?

Because the more people you pack into a place, the more government YOU NEED to build and maintain an increasingly complex and unsustainable infrastructure--and the more taxes to pay for it.

Where do you find liberal thinking--in the citiy or in the country?

OMG, what could be more obvious!

And as for a nice place to live, you can keep your deserts and landlocked Montana.

The finest real estate is where the forest meets the sea--and it's crawling with people and regulations and sewage and oil slicks.

Have fun.

And P.S. You would be amazed at how fast the vast open space you're thinking of will fill up.

You stick one house per family every square mile, and your vast area will experience a sea change.

Fences, roads, pollution, laws, taxes, rationing.

And that's only one house per square mile.

That just for starters.

81 posted on 07/09/2003 7:12:13 PM PDT by Age of Reason (Proud to Be Called an Immigration Hypocrite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
That is a great deal on housing. Sis is in Ohio (Cinci area) and while it could be worse it's not cheap - I think they paid about $110K for their place.

Vermont, where I live, is REALLY bad right now. I was looking in a real estate guide this weekend and saw a place that looked a lot like ours (I'm in a 1000 sq ft ranch) for $160K !!! With the median income up here about 30K? It's sheer insanity.

LQ
82 posted on 07/09/2003 7:13:30 PM PDT by LizardQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Why would modern men in this country get married let alone have kids when the courts are stacked against them ??

Exactly. The courts have destroyed fatherhood.

83 posted on 07/09/2003 7:13:31 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen
"Looks like Nature favors the randy and irresponsible who breed like bunnies without a thought as to if they can take care of them all ;) "

LQ

That's exactly correct.

Take a look at the randy women coming into the states from south of the border. Those women breed prolifically considering it a part of their womanhood.

Mother nature doesn't care about what you do for a living, how much money you have in the bank, how many toys you have in your home, or how responsible you are. All she cares about is whether you pass on your genes as often as possible.
84 posted on 07/09/2003 7:13:36 PM PDT by Noachian (Legislation without Representation has no place in a free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Old Teddy Roosevelt would never be elected today.

Probably not. The press would make him out to be an absolute nut. Look what they're doing to Mel Gibson....
85 posted on 07/09/2003 7:13:57 PM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen
By the way, I am damn sick of this being always being blamed on the women. I personally know several women who want kids but their husbands say "no". If these women leave these guys the odds of them finding someone else to start a family with before their eggs rot out is slim to none, so they've stayed.

Well...this is the woman's fault. Maybe they should have discussed having children before saying "I DO". Too many women think that they'll be able to change men's minds. HINT: You can't change a man's mind -- especially when it comes to children.

86 posted on 07/09/2003 7:17:27 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: xrp
All but one of them (I know 4 in this situation) had discussed it prior to marriage, and the guys said "sure, someday", then backed out when push came to shove. From where I sit it's false advertising on the part of the guy.

LQ
87 posted on 07/09/2003 7:19:46 PM PDT by LizardQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
I'm paying plenty for these hopeless schools, but have too much sense to have children before I can be absolutely assured of the financial means to keep them either in private school or homeschooled.

Give yourself more credit. It's amazing what you can do when you put your mind to it. Kids are wealth and joy and hope.

88 posted on 07/09/2003 7:20:13 PM PDT by TomSmedley ((technical writer looking for work!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
I still have half a dozen in the nest and Mrs. Geritol mostly stays home and homeschools. Work outside the home just does not make fiscal sense for her. I pay virtually no "taxes" according to that yearly return thingy, but state taxes, sales taxes, gas taxes, the FICA and other rob-the-poor-to-pay-the-poor stuff are still eating me alive.

I do not know about any marriage penalty, I tend to avoid comparing my "taxes" and such with others. It just makes me mad.
89 posted on 07/09/2003 7:22:07 PM PDT by Geritol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen
Thank you to the only patriotic person on this thread.

The American population is not falling. We are constantly reinforced by the best and brightest of the world, and by the most oppressed (and therefore the most devoted to their adopted country.)

What's more, Western women are delaying childbirth for their careers. That's a major reason we are on top.

To the rest of you: Your only problem is that when I barbequed with my patriotic Russian-speaking Ukrainian-American friends this Fourth of July, I ate dried fish, pickled mushrooms and peppers, caviar mixed with cream cheese, and some weird kind of wiessewurst (natural casing white-hots.)

Olga told stories about fixing helicopters for five years in the Marines. Her older cousin told stories about the horrible things he saw during compulsory military service in a Russian prison. (He received a computer programming degree this Spring -- in his late thirties.)

These concerns about birthrate are not just thinly disguised racism; they are patently offensive and un-American. Where do you stop? You might as well go back to the days when they objected to Irish immigration.
90 posted on 07/09/2003 7:23:44 PM PDT by Woo Way (Signed, J. Fox (a name translated from the Irish "Sionnach"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
Men aren't concerned with their feminine side. They are concerned with having their nards removed by feminazi judges.
91 posted on 07/09/2003 7:25:09 PM PDT by Ukiapah Heep (Shoes for Industry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Thanks for the explanation. Your statement just hit me the wrong way about Mexicans and Muslims.
92 posted on 07/09/2003 7:25:14 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
In 2002, there were 4,019,280 births in the United States, down slightly from 2001 (4,025,933).

There are some positive things out of this. This means that the welfare state will fall and we will crack down on immigration.

It's way past time for America to become lean again.

93 posted on 07/09/2003 7:25:46 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Uh, you're wrong, this will just give the 'immigration uber alles' folks more ammo.
94 posted on 07/09/2003 7:26:48 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Why would modern men in this country get married let alone have kids when the courts are stacked against them ?? Exactly. The courts have destroyed fatherhood.

Thank you XRP for pointing this out. No rational male gets married given the utterly corrupt court system.

The evil shysters are ending marriage as an option for women when they destroyed male civil liberties and due process in their stench-filled courts.

95 posted on 07/09/2003 7:28:10 PM PDT by friendly ((Badges?, we don gots to show no stinkin' badges!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Woo Way
"These concerns about birthrate are not just thinly disguised racism; they are patently offensive and un-American. "

You need a lesson in reading comprehension.

96 posted on 07/09/2003 7:28:35 PM PDT by ex-snook (American jobs need BALANCED TRADE. We buy from you, you buy from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: LizardQueen
Then yes, the women should drop the men like 3rd period French and find a guy who is willing to have children (like me!). :)
97 posted on 07/09/2003 7:32:51 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Woo Way
These concerns about birthrate are not just thinly disguised racism; they are patently offensive and un-American.

Ah, the "r" word--the last refuge of the defeated argument. This ain't DUh, pal. I think you took a wrong turn at "Smirking Chimp."
98 posted on 07/09/2003 7:33:51 PM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
haha

nice catch

99 posted on 07/09/2003 7:35:43 PM PDT by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
And I guarantee you, when you're 80 years old and alone, your niece won't darken your door too often, especially if she's one of those "selfish" modern women.

Unfortunately, having kids isn't a guarantee that they will be there for you in your dotage, either. I think it ups your odds, but by no means assures there will be someone to visit.

My parent's neighbor was a lovely old lady whose was like a grandmother to me while I was growing up. One of her kids (the good one) was a military wife whose husband was stationed in Spain, and the bad one lived about an hour east.

When she got senile the Spain woman refused to come home and the hour-away man put her in a nursing home and pretty much threw away the key. My parents were devastated - they had looked after her while she got frailer and had treated her better than her kids ever did.

As for myself, I'm planning on cash set aside, good friends, and a Smith & Wesson for when it gets really bad ;)

LQ

100 posted on 07/09/2003 7:36:55 PM PDT by LizardQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson