Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elbucko
"The "test" for marriage should be can, not will, but can, it result in off-spring from the union of the principle partners. If the answer is no, it's a civil contract, nothing more."

And how would we know that? Perhaps a couple should have to be one where the woman is already pregnant before marriage.

What about older men and women? What about a young couple where one person knows he/she is infertile?

18 posted on 07/11/2003 12:04:18 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: MineralMan
Bill Lockyer (the 60s something Attorney General here in CA) and his wife, who's less than half his age and expecting their first child, come to mind.
20 posted on 07/11/2003 12:05:43 PM PDT by TheAngryClam (NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MineralMan
And how would we know that?

Exactly! But we would know that a faithful, homosexual, union would not produce any natural offspring. That's the point.

60 posted on 07/11/2003 11:46:34 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson