To: elbucko
"The "test" for marriage should be can, not will, but can, it result in off-spring from the union of the principle partners. If the answer is no, it's a civil contract, nothing more."
And how would we know that? Perhaps a couple should have to be one where the woman is already pregnant before marriage.
What about older men and women? What about a young couple where one person knows he/she is infertile?
18 posted on
07/11/2003 12:04:18 PM PDT by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: MineralMan
Bill Lockyer (the 60s something Attorney General here in CA) and his wife, who's less than half his age and expecting their first child, come to mind.
20 posted on
07/11/2003 12:05:43 PM PDT by
TheAngryClam
(NO MULLIGANS- BILL SIMON, KEEP OUT OF THE RECALL ELECTION!)
To: MineralMan
And how would we know that?Exactly! But we would know that a faithful, homosexual, union would not produce any natural offspring. That's the point.
60 posted on
07/11/2003 11:46:34 PM PDT by
elbucko
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson