Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unpatriotic Conservatives -- A war against America. MANDATORY READ -- DETAILS PALEOCONSERVATIVES
National Review On-Line ^ | March 19, 2003 | David Frum

Posted on 07/24/2003 11:10:24 AM PDT by PhiKapMom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-277 next last
To: PhiKapMom
very interesting post and looking forward to reading all comments!!!
221 posted on 07/24/2003 5:52:59 PM PDT by malia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Save this kooks crap and put it where it would do the most harm.
222 posted on 07/24/2003 6:04:39 PM PDT by junta (Xenophobia a perfectly reasonable response to the feckless stupidity of globalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Kennit
Summoned by your flag, I looked through the first page of posts re: the Frumm article. This is an old argument and I only know about it by having read Taki's rebuttal in TAC.

It is pretty obvious that the conservative "movement" is dead in America. Whatever there was of it has been completely co-opted by the Republican Party. The GOP, like its "adversary" across the aisle, has a simple ideology: whatever our guys do is good; whatever the other guys do is bad.

Life is indeed simple for a good Parteigenosse.

When Clinton attacked Serbia and bombed the Sudanese factory, many members of FR objected, saying that these were violations of international law, based on flimsy or fabricated evidence.

Bush II, in keeping with the family tradition, has launched a ground war on similarly flimsy or fabricated evidence. Point this out and you are a traitor.

When the Clinton administration prolonged its blockade of Iraq, thus aggravating the suffering of its civilian population, I recall that many people on this site took Madeleine Albright to task for her expressed callous disregard for the lives of suffering non-combatants. Blockade is wrong if undertaken by a Democrat, but invasion is right if done by a Republican. Note: Iraqi possession of WMD was the alleged reason for both adverse actions.

Unless I am mistaken, the people from the Clinton administration who were in charge of INS and FAA were still in charge under Bush. Yet somehow, Clinton is responsible for letting terrorists into the country and Bush is not.

Had the Reno Justice Department decided to assume the same sweeping jurisdiction as Ashcroft's, I am sure that the "conservatives" here would have been calling us to the barricades. If a Republican does it, though, it's all for our own good.

One thing that the GOP aparatchiks do not appear to understand is that their ascendancy in DC is not permanent. This is not the 1000-Year BushReich. And the "war powers" that have been assumed by this administration will soon enough fall into the hands of their political opponents.

Then we'll see some fun, I think.

223 posted on 07/24/2003 6:06:01 PM PDT by Goetz_von_Berlichingen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
The Maytag repairman analogy you gave is an archtype. Jungian. What happened to the lighthouse keepers when the lights were automated?

Anyway I think I fit that analogy that you gave -- at least it resonated with me. I may not have liked it -- it was like awful medicine. Good for you, but yuck.

It's almost but not quite the same wisdom as "A general tends to fight the last war.".

224 posted on 07/24/2003 6:09:17 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

Comment #225 Removed by Moderator

To: rmlew
You represent a fringe for certain. I am quite familiar with "paleo" thought and have yet to see a call for the end of Israel. So if there is no call for the end of Israel then what you and the fanatics are saying about them and their purported anti-Semitism is patently false. You could be a liar then, I hope then you are not please reform and leave your path of self-destruction.
226 posted on 07/24/2003 6:22:15 PM PDT by junta (Xenophobia a perfectly reasonable response to the feckless stupidity of globalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: junta
Since the neocons admire the Comsymp Martin Luther King should they be totally dismissed

Hmmm, Charleton Heston talks about marching with Martin Luther King. Does that make Heston a "comsymp" and should he be totally dismissed?

227 posted on 07/24/2003 6:33:31 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: WFTR
That was a very well reasoned and thought out analysis of neo-cons and paleo-cons. Your description of both conservative persuasions is very close to the way I see it. Nice Work.
228 posted on 07/24/2003 6:50:58 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Goetz_von_Berlichingen
Fantastic post. Thanks for the response.
229 posted on 07/24/2003 6:54:28 PM PDT by Captain Kennit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
What a waste of manpower any Platform is. Would bet the members will be chosen at the summer meeting of the RNC when Gillespie is named Chairman. Haven't heard who they are!

230 posted on 07/24/2003 7:07:08 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
What a waste of manpower any Platform is.

The Democrats like huge platforms. Matches their huge agenda. A short statement of purpose, maybe mention of a major issue, and that ought to be that.

231 posted on 07/24/2003 7:29:22 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Cool. Glad to see this.

Nobody bothers to attack a group not perceived as a threat.
232 posted on 07/24/2003 7:46:41 PM PDT by Tauzero (This was not the sand-people, this was the work of Imperial Storm Troopers: only they are so precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I am not interested in those web sites, I am very much behind Bush. While I sometimes take issue with the litmus test that some conservatives use to identify their own, it has not separated me at all from my support for the President. (Even if I only agreed with half of his agenda or policies, that would be more than double the support I could muster for any other option.) I just grow weary of campaigns about the margins, like gay issues. A vision of lower taxes, national defense, more effecient governmental services (read privatization) etc. will attract more voters and have more far reaching impact.
233 posted on 07/24/2003 8:10:28 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero
If you read why I put this up you will see that I didn't know what the word paleo meant as I saw people on here being called that today and wondered what it was. I thought everyone should have the opportunity to see what it meant!

BTW, I was told this was originally posted in the middle of the night in June not March/April like was alleged.
234 posted on 07/24/2003 8:11:33 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
I agree with you! I don't think all the flowery words are necessary and just waste paper while not saying much! Shorter the better works for me! And then make it mean something so that is what the candidates are running on for office.
235 posted on 07/24/2003 8:13:05 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: WFTR
Much of the paleo versus neo conservative rhetoric is little more than the immature sniping of people in opposite political cliques. The stupidity comes from both sides, and I've seen in from both sides on Free Republic just as I've seen it from more nationally known figures.

That's what I've been trying to say all along.

236 posted on 07/24/2003 8:36:46 PM PDT by jmc813 (Check out the FR Big Brother 4 thread! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/943368/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: JustAnAmerican
Seems I remember Buchanan being more Anti-Israel... ----------------------------------------------------------- Pat Buchanan - Setting the Record Straight on Anti-Semitism

---------------------------------------------------------- For Immediate Release: March 1, 1996

Pat Buchanan has always favored a strong, independent state of Israel. He has been a lifelong friend to the Jewish people, both individually and collectively speaking.

In 1973, as a special assistant to President Nixon, he strongly supported the decision to aid the Israelis with a massive airlift that saved the country in the Yom Kippur War.

In 1976, he supported the Israeli raid on Entebbe, and in 1981 he supported the Begin government's attack on the Baghdad nuclear reactor.

In 1986, he was instrumental in getting Natan Sharanski released from the Gulag at the urging of his wife Avital.

His columns throughout his 20 years as a columnist contain numerous affirmations of his view that the U.S. has a "moral commitment - to guarantee the security and survival of the Israeli state," (as he told Human Events editor Allan Ryskind in 1992), and not a single reference that can remotely be considered anti-Semitic. Why, then, the charges?

The charges of anti-Semitism are based on political disputes; stands that Mr. Buchanan has taken over the years which have angered some columnists, lobbyists, and pundits. They are rooted, in part, in disagreements about the direction of American foreign policy, and have nothing to do with supposed expressions of racist or anti-Semitic sentiment by Mr. Buchanan.

Some of these stands include:

His support of the "land for peace" policy in the Middle East, which is now the official policy of the Israeli government.

His early opposition to a U.S. commitment to re-establish the Emir of Kuwait because it would put American lives at stake in a conflict that he believed was not in America's vital interest. Actually, Buchanan favored deterring Saddam Hussein's aggression in Saudi Arabia.

His defense of John Demjanjuk, a retired Cleveland auto worker, against the charge that he was "Ivan the Terrible," the Treblinka Death Camp guard responsible for the mass murder of Jews. Despite deportation by the U.S. Justice Department on the basis of evidence falsified by the Soviet KGB, the Israeli Supreme Court subsequently ruled that it was a case of mistaken identity, which Buchanan had maintained all along.

In the past six months, anonymous sources have distributed "documentation" of the charges of anti-Semitism, quoting Mr. Buchanan's past columns and public statements. These quotations -- clearly taken out of context and given the most malicious interpretation possible -- represent a transparent effort to misrepresent Pat Buchanan on issues relating to the Jewish people, Israel, and racial minorities. The following refutation of some of the more outrageous charges (in quotes) should help to set the record straight.

1. "Buchanan told Elie Wiesel that President Reagan must not surrender to 'Jewish pressure' against visiting a German cemetery where SS men were buried."

This story was originally broadcast on NBC by Marvin Kalb, soon before President Reagan made a controversial visit to Bitburg cemetery in 1985. Kalb reported that Buchanan had been observed writing, "over and over again," "succumbing to the pressure of the Jews." The alleged source of the story later told the New York Times that Kalb was mistaken about the notation, and that "This is a complete flap over nothing. . . Any criticism of Mr. Buchanan based on his notes is a bum rap." Kalb later apologized for the report.

2. "In a 1977 column Buchanan called Hitler an 'individual of great courage' who possessed 'extraordinary gifts.'"

The excerpted phrases are intended to leave the impression that the column was a tribute to Adolf Hitler. In reality, the column was, in large part, an account of historian John Toland's widely-acclaimed biography of Hitler. A characterization of Toland's depiction of Hitler, reads, "Though Hitler was indeed racist and anti-Semitic to the core, a man who without compunction could commit murder and genocide, he was also an individual of great courage, a soldier's soldier in the Great War, a political organizer of the first rank, a leader steeped in the history of Europe, who possessed oratorical powers that could awe even those who despised him." In the same column Buchanan writes that "Hitler was marching along the road toward a New Order where Western civilization would not survive." Far from an endorsement of Hitler, the column warned of making the same mistake with Mao Tse-tun and Taiwan in 1977 that deluded western leaders made with Hitler and Czechoslovakia in the `30s.

3. "In an interview in Present Tense magazine, Buchanan stated that 'if my friends in the Jewish community feel Pat Buchanan, a traditionalist Catholic, owes some kind of apology for the record of the Holy Father during World War II, they can wait, because it's not going to be forthcoming."

The context of the comment was the demand by Bronx Rabbi Avraham Weiss for the Catholic Church to expel Carmelite nuns from their convent at Auschwitz, on the grounds that their presence there was an insult to Jewish sensibilities, since Pope Pius XII and the Church were allegedly complicit in the Holocaust. Weiss actually invaded the convent at Auschwitz to protest the nuns' presence. The Boston Herald wrote in defense of Weiss' actions, saying "The coldness of it was numbing: On the spot where one-quarter of European Jewry was martyred, the church that for 1,000 years had done so much to feed anti-Semitism intended to set up shop."

Pat Buchanan wrote a column defending the Catholic Church and Pope Pius XII against the slur (which had its origins in Rolf Hochhuth's fictional play "The Deputy" in 1963), and pointing out that the contemporary testimony of Jewish leaders contradicted the charges, in fact praising Pius XII for saving Jewish lives.

4. "On the McLaughlin Report, August 26, 1990: 'There are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the middle East, the Israeli Defense Ministry and its amen corner in the United States."

Early in the Gulf crisis, before the big buildup of U.S. ground troops in the Gulf, some columnists in the U.S. and Israeli officials were clamoring for an early strike against the Iraq. According to a contemporary account in the New York Times "Many Israeli politicians, academic experts an citizens are growing nervous, and in some cases angry, after concluding that the United States wants a political solution and is not looking for a military confrontation in the Persian Gulf. "If the United States doesn't solve the problem now," Prime Minister Shamir's chief of staff was quoted, "Then, they'll have to fly the Marines back here again."

Many military experts agreed that such an action would risk a disaster. It was in this context that the remark was made. It was close to a month after the comment was made -- without objection from any quarter -- when A.M. Rosenthal made the first public accusation of anti-Semitism against Mr. Buchanan.

5. "In 1987 Buchanan lobbied to stop deportation of Karl Linnas, accused of Nazi atrocities in Estonia."

Buchanan's objection to the summary deportation of Karl Linnas to the Soviet Union -- where he had been tried in absentia and sentenced to death in 1962 -- was not that a Nazi war criminal ought not to be deported and executed, but that Linnas' deportation was based on a trial in the Soviet Union where no U.S. standards of justice applied. That judgment was seconded at the time by the Washington Post, which opined that "a true and disturbing question remains whether justice by accepted American standards was done in this case, where a human life - never mind what kind of a human he may have been -- is on the line," 6. "On March 2, 1992, at a campaign rally in Marietta, Georgia, where Rabbi Avi Weiss called out, 'Your anti-Semitism makes America last,' Buchanan shot back, "This rally is of Americans, for Americans and for the good `ol USA, my friends,"

The comment, as reported by columnists Rowland Evans and Robert Novak at the time, was not directed to the Jewish protesters, but part of the campaign speech. "It is doubtful Buchanan is talking to the protesters -- an impression confirmed by reporters on the scene who did not question the candidate about it after the incident," they wrote.

7. "In 1990, before the Gulf War, Buchanan wrote that if the US went to war, 'the fighting would be done by kids with names like McAllister, Murphy, Gonzales and Leroy Brown," The National Review commented that 'There is no way to read that sentence without concluding that Pat Buchanan was suggesting that American Jews manage to avoid personal military exposure even while advancing military policies they (uniquely?) engender."

Read in context, it is clear that Mr. Buchanan is making reference to an editorial in the Economist magazine that urged, "Mr. Bush must go to war and that "the civilized world must win this fight." Buchanan was making the point that the casualties would be American, not British. The quote from National Review's William F. Buckley, Jr., is based on his incorrect implication that the column mentioning "McAllister Murphy, Gonzales and Leroy Brown" was in the same piece that listed A.M. Rosenthal, Richard Perle, Charles Krauthammer and Henry Kissinger as supporters of an early strike against Saddam. In fact, that column addressed another issue, the looming split among conservatives on the issue of the Gulf War.

It is clear from these examples that the intent of the accusers has been to twist the truth.

On Patrick Buchanan and anti-Semitism

"As a Jew, I never felt any hostility from Buchanan on that score, never heard him make a disparaging remark about Jews, never noticed any difference in the way he treats Jews and non-Jews," -Michael Kinsley, co-host of CNN's "Crossfire"

"Even after the Rosenthal column, nobody responsible in the Republican Party said, 'Yes, Pat Buchanan is an anti-Semite.' They didn't join in. Very few journalists joined in. What happened was, when he entered the presidential politics, then he entered a new level of criticism and attack on him." -Robert Novak, syndicated columnist

"I've known [Pat] now for twenty-five years. We have agreed on almost nothing, starting with Richard Nixon . . , there's not a scintilla of evidence in all I've known about Pat that he is anti-Semitic . . , This is an attempt to say that if you disagree with Israel on a matter of policy, you can be called anti-Semitic..." -Jack Germond, Baltimore Sun columnist

"No true Christian can carry within his heart hatred for any of God's children . . . I am as aware as any other Christian that our Savior was Jewish, His mother was Jewish. The Apostles were Jewish. The first martyrs were Jewish...So no true Christian, in my judgment, can be an anti-Semite." - Pat Buchanan, comment to a Christian magazine, 1992

Selected Quotations from columns by Patrick J, Buchanan On the Israeli invasion of Lebanon, 6/25/82 "Politically, mankind suffered no irreversible loss with the sweeping of the PLO from the international chess board. As virulently anti-American as it was anti-Israeli, the PLO has been a Soviet cat's-paw, the linchpin of international terror, the base camp for the worst elements on earth, a friend to every enemy of the United States from the Sandinistas in Nicaragua to Idi Amin in Uganda."

On the state of Israel, 1983 "Israel remains a tough, resourceful, energetic nation, an offspring of the West . . . whose current struggle merits sympathy and support."

On the Israeli strike against Iraqi nuclear reactor, 6/11/81 "From a security perspective, the Israelis' preemptive strike against the Iraqi nuclear reactor outside Baghdad was timely and crucial. ...Given the implacable hatred of Baghdad for Israel-- the nation is referred to only as "The Zionist Entity" -- the prospect, indeed, the probability of atomic weapons in Iraqi hands, was one with which the Israelis literally could not live. ...righteous United States condemnation of Israel, a small sliver of land with three major cities, rings hollow. How, for example, would we expect President Reagan and Secretary of State Haig to act if weapons-grade material were being fed into a Soviet-built Cuban reactor, with Castro declaring: 'This one is for the Yankees. ...what Israeli could go to sleep secure with revanchist Palestinians a few miles away nursing their hatred of the 'Zionist imperialists' who destroyed their homeland and drove their fathers and mothers into refugee camps?"

On the Israeli annexation of the Golan Heights, 12/17/85 "It would not be at all unreasonable if the Israelis came to the conclusion that their survival, more than ever, depends upon themselves alone. If a majority in that country have arrived at such a conclusion, it is natural to seek security in geography and guns, not treaties and talk. ...The militants -- Syria, Libya, Iraq, the military wing of the PLO -- will settle for nothing less than eradication of the "Zionist entity" from the Arab world. Within Egypt, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia, there are millions more for whom the humbling and destruction of the Jewish state is a nightly dream. Even the "moderate" governments in the region -- Egypt, for example -- could probably not survive a permanent peace which left East Jerusalem under Israeli control."

On former Prime Minister Rabin, 9/17/93 "...the statesman who brought peace after a half century of fighting for Israel's place in the sun."

237 posted on 07/24/2003 8:48:45 PM PDT by Old Fud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Old Fud
Thank you for this counterweight to the vicious defamation against Mr. Buchanan. To it, I would add that in "The Death of the West", he defends Israel as a microcosm of Western Civilization, and is sympathetic to its situation surrounded by its enemies.
238 posted on 07/24/2003 8:57:23 PM PDT by Captain Kennit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
There are some other cool ways to describe 'em. Marxist-Buchanists is my favorite at the moment.

Another goodie is to refer to Pat as Lord Haw Haw (look him up).

Lord Haw Haw

Although Joyce was born in the USA, brought up in Ireland and took German nationality on 26 September 1939, he was charged with treason from 3 September 1939 to 2 July 1940, the date his British passport ran out, and sentenced to death. Joyce was confined in a death cell at London's Wandsworth Prison. In the cell next door was John Amery, the son of a British lord and the man who had tried to form British expatriates and sympathetic British POW's into a Freicorp to fight on the German side. Joyce was executed five days after Amery on 3 January 1946. He was adamant and defiant to the end. He showed no emotion when confronted by news and scenes from the concentration camps, blaming the deaths on starvation and disease caused by Allied bombing of communication lines. He also scratched a swastika on the wall of his cell whilst awaiting sentence. His last public message reported by the BBC was "In death as in life, I defy the Jews who caused this last war, and I defy the powers of darkness they represent." He was not yet 40 years old when executed. He was buried in an unmarked grave in the grounds of the prison.

239 posted on 07/24/2003 8:57:35 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
This David Frum essay started some serious debates between all types of conservatives, back when it was originally released.

I happen to agree with most of what Frum writes and think it should be mandatory reading for all political junkies and interested parties.

240 posted on 07/24/2003 9:04:22 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-277 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson