Replies

This article paints with too broad a brush and it lumps together people of some very different stripes.

Certainly, few of the people identified as being of the same mind by this article have been citing Noam Chomski's views or notions in an approving manner. Yet, the implication of this article is that these people all love and cite Chomski now.

Also, I do not believe that Robert Novak is paleo-critter. And, while Novak has been sceptical on the current war in Iraq, he is and remains a patriot. Using his scepticism on Iraq to lump him with loonies like Pat Buchanan is at best misleading.

I think the point that was being made is that it matters not why the "paleos" seem to hate the "neos" more than the liberals, but that the effect is the same for all the mentioned pundits.

A nice bash for a Bush, with a thinly veiled desire for his loss to a Democrat. Really, I don't see any daylight between that position and Howard Dean's. That's the part I find unacceptable.