To: JeanS
Re: the Mac's Lounge coffee spill...the initial award was for millions, and the gal did have 3rd degree burns on her woo woo, but the case was ultimately settled out of court for medical costs and a portion of her attorney's fees.
4 posted on
07/27/2003 4:41:34 AM PDT by
SaudiDuck
To: SaudiDuck
Thank God, the shyster in a pure nuisance suit got paid.
Everything is all right then.
That was, by all accounts, the only reason this suit went forward... attorney fees.
5 posted on
07/27/2003 4:53:41 AM PDT by
Bluntpoint
(Not there! Yes, there!)
To: SaudiDuck
The only legitimate suit a lawyer can file, in my honest opinion, is a suit for "wrongful life" against his or her parents.
6 posted on
07/27/2003 4:56:30 AM PDT by
Bluntpoint
(Not there! Yes, there!)
To: SaudiDuck
Altho the McD's coffee case is often trotted out as an example of a silly lawsuit, in fact it was a very valid strike for consumers.
It turned out that McD's was keeping its coffee fully 50 degrees (F) hotter than any home perc would. This was official McDonald's policy for all its restaurants. Hardened truck drivers couldn't even drink it without waiting about 20 minutes for it to cool. Evidently the McD's strategy was that, by making people sit around waiting for their coffee to cool to a tolerable level, they might also order more food.
For years before the plaintiff in that case ever got her coffee at the McDonald's drive-thru window, the McDonald's HQ had gotten a LOT of complaints and reports of injuries about its super-heated coffee, yet they continued to serve their coffee hot enough to glow in the dark (figuratively). Nothing short of a major lawsuit by someone they had injured would have changed their way.
8 posted on
07/27/2003 6:26:31 AM PDT by
DonQ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson