Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
The following passages from the article are so very clintonesque, meaning so directed to obfuscate and dissemble and twist the truth:

Not content to just write a watered down, sorry excuse for an abortion ban, the Senate goes on in Sec. 4, to let us all know "The Sense on the Senate Concerning Roe. v. Wade". I am not sure what kind of sense these people have, but we have definitely found out what we get for thirty years of loyalty. The 48 Republican Senators who voted to approve S.3, pledged that, "the decision of the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade [410 U.S. 113 (1973)] was appropriate and secures an important constitutional right; and such decision should not be overturned".
Folks, that is a clintonian LIE. 'You need to read that again' ... the author is purposely LYING to the reader by twisting the facts. The Harkin 'sense of the Senate' (S.4) was voted upon prior to the S.3 bill as offered by Santorum. The S.3 bill (which received its designation prior to the Harkin offering, so Harkin's non-binding got S.4 designation) was voted upon after more debate and that bill was passed, then the Harkin ploy was attached to the S.3 bill as an effort to make it an amendment. As I recall, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins and one or two other Republicans voted to support Harkin's 'Sense of the Senate' but they definitely did not vote to make the Harkin NON-BINDING resolution a part of the S.3 bill for passage.

What the author of the article tried to do was have the reader believe 48 Republican Senators voted to have Roe codified into Senate passed law. Count the number of Republican votes for the Harkin non-binding resolution. It comes up far short of 48! Mercuria apparently read the lies the way the author intended, and was led astray. The DNC would be ecstatic if large numbers of republican voters were as easily led astray and manipulated. What has our nation become when blatant lies persuade so easily?! LIES are DNC daily tools, used often and with malice of forethought, to confuse and manipulate We the People. Sadly, too many people swallow the lies without choking, then become the willing dupes of the dissemblers and liars.

The author of the piece wrote, "You need to read that again. I've read it about 20 times and it still hurts to look at it." What utter calculated bullshit! An invitation to reread the lies in an effort to have the reader swallow them whole!

Then this blatant liar goes on in clintonesque fashion to say, "Please understand that it was not just a few renegade Senators who voted for this. It was 48 Republican Senators, including every one of them who ever told us they were pro-life, who put their name on a bill that says; Roe v. Wade was "appropriate." This is a clear, unambiguous reaffirmation of the illegal Supreme Court decision that started this whole mess back in 1973. If I had not read it for myself I would not believe it. The author is a lying agent of dnc propaganda, willingly or unwittingly. Giving him the benefit of the doubt, we'll assume unwittingly. What kind of person who is so easily manipulated is suited to public office. Don't we have enough democrat liars and thieves, dissemblers and murder champions? How very clintonesque to lie and dissemble in order to try and create political capital regardless of the damage done to the nation!

85 posted on 08/05/2003 7:53:24 AM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

YOU ROCK!


98 posted on 08/05/2003 8:17:02 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
Marvin, what was the legal definition of "partial birth abortion" before the passage of this bill?

Or was there even a legal definition before this?

If not, then what was the accepted definition.
105 posted on 08/05/2003 8:25:18 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
Excellent post Marvin. You nailed it.
162 posted on 08/05/2003 12:07:01 PM PDT by William Wallace (“This time I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton. I think this is the end.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

To: MHGinTN
Yup. UncleBill's article here is pure anti-Republican propaganda. All lies. Looks like the Constitutionalists are not above joining in with the liberals when it comes to propagandizing. Oh, well.
163 posted on 08/05/2003 12:13:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson