Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hijacker Crashed Flight 93 on 9/11
AP via Yahoo! ^ | 8/7/03 | TED BRIDIS, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 08/07/2003 4:22:34 PM PDT by dead

WASHINGTON - U.S. investigators now believe that a hijacker in the cockpit aboard United Airlines Flight 93 instructed terrorist-pilot Ziad Jarrah to crash the jetliner into a Pennsylvania field because of a passenger uprising in the cabin.

This theory, based on the government's analysis of cockpit recordings, discounts the popular perception of insurgent passengers grappling with terrorists to seize the plane's controls.

The government's findings — laid out deep within the report on the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that was sent to Congress last month — aim to resolve one of the enduring mysteries of the deadliest terror attacks in U.S. history: What happened in the final minutes aboard Flight 93?

The FBI strenuously maintains that its analysis does not diminish the heroism of passengers who — with the words "Let's roll" — apparently rushed down the airliner's narrow aisle to try to overtake the hijackers.

President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft have regularly praised the courage of those aboard Flight 93, some of whom told family members by telephone they were planning to storm the cockpit.

"While no one will ever know exactly what transpired in the final minutes of Flight 93, every shred of evidence indicates this plane crashed because of the heroic actions of the passengers," FBI spokeswoman Susan Whitson said Thursday.

Thirty-three passengers, seven crew members and the four hijackers died.

Citing transcripts of the still-secret cockpit recordings, FBI Director Robert Mueller told congressional investigators in a closed briefing last year that, minutes before Flight 93 hit the ground, one of the hijackers "advised Jarrah to crash the plane and end the passengers' attempt to retake the airplane."

Jarrah is thought to have been the terrorist-pilot because he was the only of the four hijackers aboard known to have a pilot's license.

Mueller's description was disclosed in a brief passage far into the 858-page report to Congress. Previous statements by FBI and other government officials have been ambiguous about what occurred in the cockpit.

Mueller's explanation was based on the FBI's efforts to decipher the cacophonous sounds on the cockpit recorder and produce a comprehensive transcript, said one official, speaking only on condition of anonymity.

The FBI is convinced it may never know for certain what transpired in those final moments, but Mueller represented the information as the FBI's leading theory, this official said.

The same cockpit recording was played privately in April 2002 for family members of victims aboard Flight 93, and the FBI also provided them with its best effort at producing an understandable transcript.

Some family members indicated afterward they were led to believe that passengers used a food cart as a shield and successfully broke into the cockpit.

The FBI has been loath to publicly put forward a contradictory theory out of sensitivity to the families and because of uncertainty about what happened.

People who have heard the recording describe it as nearly indecipherable, containing static noises, cockpit alarms and wind interspersed with cries in English and Arabic. Near the end of the tape, sounds can be heard of breaking glass and crashing dishes — lending credence to the theory that passengers used the food cart to rush the jetliner's narrow aisle.

Separately, the data recorder showed the plane's wings rocking violently as the jet flew too low and too fast for safe flight.

Intelligence officials believe the likely target for Flight 93 was the White House, based on information from Abu Zubaydah, a senior al-Qaida terrorist leader in U.S. custody who is believed to have played a key role in organizing the Sept. 11 attacks.

Prosecutors have sought a U.S. judge's permission to play recordings from Flight 93 during the terrorism trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the only defendant in a U.S. case prosecutors have directly tied to the attacks. Moussaoui is accused of conspiring with the hijackers.

The government has said it can link Moussaoui to Jarrah, using a telephone number found on a business card recovered at the Shanksville, Pa., crash site. Prosecutors believe the card belonged to Jarrah and that Moussaoui had called the same number.

Moussaoui has acknowledged allegiance to Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida but says he was not involved in the attacks.

___


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 911report; americanheroes; blessthemall; fbi; flight93; godblessthem; heroes; jarrah; letsroll; moussaoui; robertmueller; targets; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-399 next last
To: John W
They didn't make it into the cockpit.

There is even some question about why the plane even crashed -- there is a strong possibility (as someone else alluded to in this thread) that the "pilot" simply lost control of the aircraft, either as a result of the distraction of the passenger uprising or as a result of his poor flying skills.

81 posted on 08/07/2003 5:27:46 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: dead
While I firmly believe that the passangers were heros, I just as firmly believe that the inflight seperation of one of the powerplants and one of the main landing gear assemblies, several miles prior to impact, would have been almost impossible to percipitate by the actions of the passangers or the illicit flight crew.
82 posted on 08/07/2003 5:28:07 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomB
See #81.
83 posted on 08/07/2003 5:28:14 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
Instead, they criticize a govt that they are part of. They are aiding and abetting the enemy

Al Gore made me sick with his hateful little "speech" today.

84 posted on 08/07/2003 5:29:13 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: grayout
"That story doesn't jibe with me. The terrorists could fly the planes themselves."

Brilliant! Not much gets past you, does it?
85 posted on 08/07/2003 5:29:19 PM PDT by Pukka Puck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring; Lancey Howard
>>>
Because the hijackers figured that if the passengers had retaken control of the cabin, they were about to retake control of the cockpit, and the hijackers, chickensh*ts that they were panicked.
<<<

And no 70 black-eyed virgins if they are taken alive I presume.
86 posted on 08/07/2003 5:29:23 PM PDT by evilC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
One other thing. I doubt that any of the passengers' relative spoke Arabic so they would not be able to tell what the hijackers were saying to each other. Thus they wouldn't be able to contradict the FBI interpretation of what was going on in the voice recording.
87 posted on 08/07/2003 5:29:45 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
That still doesn't answer the question. If they were planning to crash into the White House, and they didn't because of the passengers actions, how can you say the passengers weren't successful?
88 posted on 08/07/2003 5:30:40 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Yep, kept them away from DC.
89 posted on 08/07/2003 5:31:20 PM PDT by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
I never belived the american 'lets roll' hero story and I still don't. I think its more likely we shot it down,

What are your thoughts on the Apollo space program?

LVM

90 posted on 08/07/2003 5:33:35 PM PDT by LasVegasMac (Those that live by the sword get shot by those that don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dead
The bottom line is that the plane did not hit any target, and that is because the passengers fought. I do not see where anything has changed about the story really ...
91 posted on 08/07/2003 5:34:52 PM PDT by hemogoblin (The few, the proud, the 537.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
There is even some question about why the plane even crashed -- there is a strong possibility (as someone else alluded to in this thread) that the "pilot" simply lost control of the aircraft, either as a result of the distraction of the passenger uprising or as a result of his poor flying skills.

Thats a pretty odd and narrow definition of success.

I would ask this:
a) if, as you said, the pilot lost contol of the aircraft due to the passenger uprising and crashed it, did that thwart the terrorists plans for that day? Hasn't thwarting of the terrorists plan been the measure of success since the day it happened?

b) you mentioned the pilots "poor flying skills". Are you suggesting that the pilot might have just happened to lose control of the aircraft at the same time as a passenger uprising and that this was coincidence and had nothing to do with the passenger uprising going on other than time of occurrence?
92 posted on 08/07/2003 5:36:44 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LasVegasMac
What are your thoughts on the Apollo space program?

LOL.
93 posted on 08/07/2003 5:37:19 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
US warplane shot down this plane. It is obvious but it is not what the public wants to hear. It was tragic but necessary to shoot the plane down. It explains why the wreckage was found spread about over several miles.

94 posted on 08/07/2003 5:38:31 PM PDT by Silas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dead
the rebellious passengers prevented the Islamist from slamming the plane into the White House, a nuclear plant or the Capitol.....

what they did was the truest form of heroism.....they could have crouched down in a fetal position and cried but they didn't....they diverted the plane from causing perhaps thousands of deaths....

I thank them always....

95 posted on 08/07/2003 5:39:11 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: Alberta's Child
They WERE successful in stopping the plane from hitting its target, unless you think the target was an empty field.
97 posted on 08/07/2003 5:40:18 PM PDT by Pukka Puck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
You make some good points.

There are some people here whose cynicism rises to pathological levels.

98 posted on 08/07/2003 5:41:34 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: TomB
If they were planning to crash into the White House, and they didn't because of the passengers actions, how can you say the passengers weren't successful?

If the aircraft crashed because of the passengers' actions, then the passengers were successful. If the aircraft crashed for some other reason, then the passengers were not successful but were "heroic" nonetheless.

99 posted on 08/07/2003 5:42:11 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

Comment #100 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-399 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson