To: Pukka Puck
newbie, you are not really worth talking to. There are so many news accounts of flight 93 being shot down. Why don't you do a google search or better yet a FR search. Have you even heard of WND ? Here is a link:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30682 Do your homework before you even think about posting here again.
134 posted on
08/07/2003 6:06:07 PM PDT by
Silas
To: Silas
Nutcase, you are relying on second hand reports from the tabloid Daily Mirror. Even in this bit of fluff the witness watched the plane in its intact form fly into the ground. It does not report the plane falling in many pieces from the sky. This report makes it seem as if a strange, aircraft matching no type of airplane in our military inventory caused the plane to crash by following it.
What a silly little conspiracy theorist you are.
To: Silas
Why don't you do a google search or better yet a FR search. Have you even heard of WND ? Here is a link: Do your homework before you even think about posting here again. My aren't we full of ourselves!
Jeesh.
159 posted on
08/07/2003 6:23:33 PM PDT by
HairOfTheDog
(And whither then? I cannot say)
To: Silas
Do your homework before you even think about posting here again. Take your own advice.
To: Silas
Oh, for Ghu's sake, we've already beaten WorldNutDaily to death for the ridiculous assertions in this article:
1)One witness claims that Flight 93 "hardly made any sound" as it passed 40 feet overhead.
2)Another witness claims to have seen Flight 93 passing 50 feet overhead while coming down at a 45 degree angle.
The testimony at the Salem witch trials had more credibility than this nonsense.
378 posted on
08/08/2003 4:32:48 PM PDT by
steve-b
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson