To: Poohbah
People on FR love to prove major media are wrong. Got any proof in this case?
There are both preceding and subsequent AQ uses of small bombs on passenger planes.
It might also be possible the plane was shot down, but that might not have been possible, depeding on what we managed to get off the ground.
It is impossible for 6x7' pieces of wing, body parts, etc. to bounce 8 miles.
188 posted on
08/07/2003 6:38:05 PM PDT by
eno_
To: eno_
It is impossible for 6x7' pieces of wing, body parts, etc. to bounce 8 miles. Could you post a link to prove that assertion? As I said before, I live only 20 miles from the site and I never heard of anything other than papers being found away from the crash site.
194 posted on
08/07/2003 6:40:21 PM PDT by
TomB
To: eno_
People on FR love to prove major media are wrong. Got any proof in this case?Statement of an ex-war-buddy in Somerset County. "Wreckage" found eight miles away was paper and was DOWNWIND of the crash site. The heavier stuff was clustered in the immediate area of impact, consonant with a CFIT event.
There are both preceding and subsequent AQ uses of small bombs on passenger planes.
True, but the evidence doesn't support it in this case.
It is impossible for 6x7' pieces of wing, body parts, etc. to bounce 8 miles
They didn't.
205 posted on
08/07/2003 6:46:14 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: eno_
No bomb. Not shot down. That's the fact jack.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson