To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Maybe Gibson needs a counter protest? I'm not going to watch the movie, now. Don't be a fool. You need to reread the article and see it is nothing but fluff. None of the so-called "softenings" listed would make the film inaccurate. The article is liberal wishful thinking on the part of beliefnet.com.
26 posted on
08/14/2003 3:13:03 AM PDT by
Longshanks
(How many truths... one or many?)
To: Longshanks; kstewskis; Victoria Delsoul; kattracks; lorrainer; maximillian; MozartLover; ...
I agree with your assessment. Mel has got a winner in this movie, and he will not compromise his faith to appease thosue who wish to seek the destruction of this film.
Let's allow this movie to speak for itself!
30 posted on
08/14/2003 5:40:43 AM PDT by
Northern Yankee
(Freedom.... needs a soldier !)
To: Longshanks; Arthur Wildfire! March
A Huge Counter Protest was what the author was suggesting in this article. He was urging Mel to release his film in select theaters all over the USA for public reaction. He was betting people would be lined up around the block to get in.
68 posted on
08/14/2003 9:23:02 AM PDT by
ex-Texan
(My tag line is broken !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson