[LiteKeeper]

Not a reliable source for scientific inquiry.

What evidence do you have to back up your assertion? There is not a single instance in the Bible that references anything scientific where it has been demonstrated as wrong. Do you disallow it because it is not "naturalistic?" If so, you are going to have a hard time dealing with such things as information, the mind, and other non-material realities that naturalistic science cannot touch.

[August West]

The onus is on the person trying to prove reliability, not the other way around. What evidence do YOU have? I disallow it as it is basically hearsay. Just because something is printed in the Bible does not make it true. I happan to believe that most of it is true, but faith is no substitute for empirical evidence. I don't understand what you mean by "naturalistic".