Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NukeMan
Radiocarbon dating showed that humans were unquestionably at the site between 14,000 and 15,000 years ago and possibly as early as 16,000 years ago, according to Adovasio's findings.

But some scholars believe the samples could have been contaminated with coal that dissolved into groundwater.

I wonder why the author says "unquestionably", and then follows it immediately with a question.

5 posted on 08/22/2003 9:02:34 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Physicist
Has no independent verification been allowed? If so, where did he publish?
6 posted on 08/22/2003 9:16:31 AM PDT by balrog666 (Wisdom comes by disillusionment. -George Santanyana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Physicist
Heh! Exactly right. If there were no controversy, the article would not exist. Her inclusion of 'unquestionably' reminds me of the misuse of 'literally' - people are often meaning 'figuratively' instead.
10 posted on 08/22/2003 9:55:01 AM PDT by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson