When the movie Philadelphia came out nine years ago last spring, TIME and Newsweek both jumped on the "gay-rights" bandwagon and ran special issues the same week devoted to the HRC crusade, on the pretext of reviewing the movie. One of the articles recounted how a liberal cabal in a small New England fishing port had passed a gay-friendly "anti-discrimination" ordinance, which was then the object of a rollback referendum. The article ridiculed one couple who were leading the referendum election campaign, noting that the proof of their homophobia came oozing out of them when they started talking about how in their opinion gays were on the edge of demanding the right to marry each other and to adopt children. They were prophetic, but the journalistic ice pick writing the article used their insight against them and falsely painted them as "phobes" and "haters".
Meanwhile, the gay political leadership has emphasized maintaining a united front among deviants, following Marx and the mass-party 19th-century communists, and has maintained solidarity with the worst pervs by refusing to criticize the indefensible. I think the real reason is that the leaders are indeed, as Bruce says, committed to a goal of forcing society to accept any number of deviant practices, including pederasty and pedophilia, as "normal".
I'm glad to see Tammy Bruce break ranks with all that -- I guess she needed fresh air. I haven't seen Camille Paglia's opinion of Greek-style pederasty, but IIRC she has already condemned pedophiles.