[Polycarp]

If as many as 58% of voters (and probably more) support this amendment, it's clear that there's going to be quite a few Democrats in the House and the Senate failing to represent their constituents if they refuse to support the amendment. Yet, many Democrats from deeply conservative states like the Dakotas, Louisiana or the Carolinas have so far showed themselves unwilling to support something like the FMA, let alone combat the sodomite agenda. Accordingly, many Republicans are discovering a wedge issue that may help disembowel the Democrats in the next election cycle.

Note to the Bush Administration: public, vocal opposition to the homosexual marriage agenda will get you votes. Kowtowing to homosexuals will lose you votes.

Please act correspondingly.

Or don't. If you want to lose your broad base.

[cake_crumb]

"Note to the Bush Administration: public, vocal opposition to the homosexual marriage agenda will get you votes. Kowtowing to homosexuals will lose you votes"

I don't understand why you said that. It doesn't seem like sarcasm. The Constitutional ammendment to define marriage as between a man and a woman was PRESIDENT BUSH'S IDEA. He came OUT with it in reaction to that stinking SCOTUS decision which went AGAINST the Constitution.

So he made a speech at a gay meeting once. What's he supposed to do, ignore everyone? Yeah, THAT'LL help hold this country together.