Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: DoctorZIn; nuconvert; seamole; AdmSmith; Valin; yonif; McGavin999; Eala; RaceBannon
Flawed Approaches on Iran

By Jon B. Wolfsthal

Even during the depths of the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union often worked together to halt the spread of nuclear weapons to new countries. Now, both countries are dealing with the realization that Iran's nuclear program is more advanced than previously thought and may be aimed directly at acquiring nuclear weapons in the next few years. Unfortunately, the approaches being pursued by both countries will do nothing to slow Iran's ability to produce nuclear weapons, and a new approach and better coordination is desperately needed before it is too late.

For the better part of a decade, U.S. officials pressured Russia to stop its support for the Bushehr nuclear reactor project in Iran. The United States argued that the power plant was a front for Iran to acquire weapons-related technology, a charge that Russian rejected. It now appears that both sides may have been wrong.

Counter to U.S. projections, Iran appears to have used Pakistan and other third parties to develop a uranium enrichment technology based on centrifuges, instead of relying on covert acquisitions of Russian technology. This does not mean, however, that Russian experts or companies have not been involved in this program without the Kremlin's knowledge or permission -- only that Russia appears not to be the primary source of Iran's newfound capabilities. Yet Russia also ignored clear signs that Iran was interested in much more than a peaceful nuclear power program. Its willingness to engage in nuclear commerce with Iran, while financially beneficial, is now coming back to negatively effect Russia's security.

To remedy the situation, the two countries have adopted similarly flawed approaches. Russian officials are working with Iran to ensure that any fuel used in the reactor at Bushehr -- fuel that when reprocessed could produce hundreds of nuclear weapons worth of plutonium -- is returned to Russia. For its part, with Russian support, the United States is pushing Iran to join the IAEA's enhanced inspection agreement, which will give the agency broader inspection and monitoring rights in Iran.

While both of these initiatives are helpful, they will do absolutely nothing to head off the main challenge posed by Iran's growing nuclear program -- Tehran's construction of advanced centrifuge enrichment facilities that could produce enough weapons-grade uranium for 20 weapons per year by the end of the decade. Iran has stated that it is developing the means to produce its own enriched uranium fuel for the Bushehr reactors out of concern that the United States will convince Russia to cut off its fuel supply.

Under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, to which Iran is a party, states are entitled to engage in all manner of peaceful nuclear development as long as they accept international inspections. This provision, however, allows states to use the cover of the treaty to acquire the very means to produce a formidable nuclear arsenal, and then later withdraw from the pact and use the material for nuclear weapons. At the heart of international concerns is the risk that Iran will follow just this scenario to the detriment of regional and even global security.

To head off this eventuality, the United States and Russia should reach quick agreement on a new strategy that would not only head off Iran's nuclear weapons potential, but address the underlying flaw in the NPT system. At a minimum, Russia should offer to guarantee -- with explicit U.S. endorsement -- Iran's supply of fuel for the Bushehr reactor as long as Iran abandons its indigenous uranium enrichment and plutonium production programs. This offer would give Iran a clear choice -- a reliable foreign source of nuclear energy or an internal nuclear program with weapons potential. The choice that Iran makes would help show the international community Iran's true intentions.

To many, it is already clear that at a minimum, Iran is seeking the option of producing nuclear weapons through its own independent nuclear program. Given its history of conflict with Iraq -- a state by no means guaranteed of a peaceful and stable future -- as well as the perceived threats from Israel's and America's nuclear arsenals, Iran's position is understandable in some circles. But this nuclear option would only serve to increase the desire of other countries, including Saudi Arabia, Syria and even a future independent Iraq, to acquire their own nuclear options, to say nothing of the steps Israel might take before Iran's became a reality.

Thus, in addition to the offer to guarantee Iran's supply of low enriched uranium fuel for its nuclear reactor, the United States and Russia should revisit the idea of establishing a clear policy that nuclear weapons will not be used to threaten states that do not have nuclear weapons or an active nuclear program. Amazingly, since the end of the Cold War, both the United States and Russia have increased the circumstances under which they would be willing to use or threaten use of nuclear weapons. It is time the two countries recognize that such a policy has negative implications that could drive states to acquire nuclear weapons.

Russia and America have an important legacy of preventing proliferation of which they should be proud. It is a legacy that should be revived and focused on the core proliferation threats in Iran and elsewhere before the nuclear confrontation of the Cold War is replaced by a broader nuclear competition the two states will not find as easy to control.

Jon B. Wolfsthal, deputy director of the Nonproliferation Project at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, contributed this comment to The Moscow Times.
27 posted on 08/31/2003 10:02:04 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: DoctorZIn; nuconvert; yonif; AdmSmith; seamole; Valin; McGavin999; windchime; Eala; ...
Signing additional protocol should be decided by government

Tehran, Aug 31, IRNA -- Head of Majlis Energy Commission Hossein
Afarideh said here Sunday that the government, and not international
pressure, should be the basis of signing the additional protocol to
the Non-Proliferation-Treaty (NPT).
Given that Iran` nuclear program is peaceful, there are no concerns
over International Atomic Energy Agency`s (IAEA) inspectors visiting
the Iranian facilities, he told reporters. "The European Union has
been influenced by US pressures."
The IAEA delegation that recently visited Iran, had no
restrictions on inspection of the nuclear facilities or taking
samples, "which in itself is indicative of Iran`s peaceful
On wether Iran should abandon NPT altogether, he said uninformed
individuals should refrain from making statements which might create
tension in the society.
There should be a thorough evaluation of the issue and these
individuals should not make such statements, Afarideh underlined.
Furthermore, some people oppose Iran having a peaceful nuclear
program under any circumstances, "not even accelerator facilities
with agricultural and medical applications," the MP from Shirvan
Meanwhile, Iran has invited the European Union for bilateral
cooperation in the country`s nuclear programs, Head of Iran`s Atomic
Energy Organization (IAEO) Gholam-Reza Aqazadeh said here Saturday.
Talking to reporters after his meeting with EU Foreign Policy
Chief Javier Solana, Aqazadeh said Iran has asked the EU to prevent
the politicization of the country`s nuclear programs.
"During the meeting, we asked the EU representative to prevent
the politicization of Iran`s nuclear activities so that the agency
(International Atomic Energy Agency) could continue its work in a
calm atmosphere without propaganda," Aqazadeh said.
"Touching upon the Additional Protocol to the Non-Proliferation
Treaty (NPT), we told the European side that Iran is ready to launch
the expert discussion to this effect," he added.
He underlined the need to hold talks with the IAEA and said, "It
is natural that there are important issues which should be discussed
by the two sides in order to clear the ambiguities."
The official noted that Iran`s cooperation with the IAEA is
beyond legal commitments as the director general of the agency
had confirmed such an issue so the agency can be helped to reach
favorable results.
He said this time the two sides held more positive talks compared
to previous negotiations, adding that European states are interested
in cooperating more with Iran after signing the Additional Protocol.
"The EU is also interested to be informed of Iran`s nuclear
programs," he added.
28 posted on 08/31/2003 10:06:43 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson