To: hapy
Here's a silly.....maybe not so silly solution....split California into Northern California and Southern California....equal representation from both states since it's so hugh that a single politician can't possibly become known only if he/she is a celebrity.....
After all...we have North/South Carolina, Dakota......
8 posted on
09/03/2003 11:09:37 AM PDT by
smiley
To: smiley
I've supported this concept for years. But I would cut the state vertically, having an East and West California. Cut off all of the coastal counties, perhaps through LA, and leave the Central Valley, Orange County, the Inland Empire, and San Diego County in East California.
14 posted on
09/03/2003 11:16:59 AM PDT by
My2Cents
("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
To: smiley
No ! Not enough room in the senate for 2 more polidiots.
15 posted on
09/03/2003 11:19:29 AM PDT by
Squantos
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: smiley
I think if you look at Conservative vs Liberal voting patterns, East and West California is a better idea.
17 posted on
09/03/2003 11:21:45 AM PDT by
Weimdog
(A California family since 1910)
To: smiley
The idea of carving another
state out of California has been around since at least '41. Personally I'd rather see it split in 4, with the east/west split due to political differences and a north/south split due to economic differences.
To: smiley
Here's a silly.....maybe not so silly solution....split California into Northern California and Southern California....equal representation from both states since it's so hugh that a single politician can't possibly become known only if he/she is a celebrity.....
Instead of splitting CA (so that the former CA would effectively get two more Senators, and also two more electoral votes), why not change CA's electoral vote system to some form of proportional representation?
In 2000, Assemblyman Tony Strickland (R-37) proposed letting each Congressional district have one electoral vote. The two other votes would go to the winner of the popular vote across CA. I liked his proposal, especially because CA's Congressional representation keeps increasing, but I never heard about his proposal again.
In the extreme, if CA had a little over half of the US population, Presidential elections would no longer need to be conducted in the other 49 states if CA doesn't change its distribution of electoral votes. Because different areas of CA are so different, with each county almost like a mini-state, Strickland's proposal seemed like a great idea.
54 posted on
09/03/2003 1:04:02 PM PDT by
heleny
To: smiley
No, that's not silly. For years up in extreme Northern California and Southern Oregon there has been a movement to secede from both states and create a new one. It will be called The State of Jefferson. I really wish it would happen.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson