[Servant of the Nine]

"It doesn't become child pornography when you're just dealing with nudity," Dyer said.

Unbelieveable.

If nudity alone is kiddie porn, then all our pics of our baby children in the bathtub are legally kiddieporn, and if we ever make an enemy of a prosecutor, they can put us away for it, and when we get out we will be labeled a sexual predator for the rest of our lives.

So9

[Pan_Yans Wife]

But the show used videotape, so then you could say that the advertisers were endorsing pornography, because they paid for it, right?

I wonder if advertisers will pull their endorsements?

[cavtrooper21]

My wife thinks that there may have been a case like that in the late 80's, involving a relitive, but she's not sure.
Says there is a Lifetime movie about it.
Get back to you if she can hunt any more info up.

Scary thought though....

[Eric Esot]

If nudity alone is kiddie porn, then all our pics of our baby children in the bathtub are legally kiddieporn, and if we ever make an enemy of a prosecutor, they can put us away for it, and when we get out we will be labeled a sexual predator for the rest of our lives.

Nope, that argument would never see the light of day - Under 18 U.S. Code Section 2256 - it is "sexually explicit conduct" (actual or simulated, a depiction), of an "identifiable minor".

[N3WBI3]

People dont buy pictures of babies taking a bath to get aroused, and I am guessing they doint buy ggw for the memories..