Replies

Why the administration downplays what evidence it does have, which is quite substantial, is a mystery.

I used to think it was a mystery, but I'm convinced now that it's only because they don't want to rile the country up as a whole, at least not just yet. I'm sure they know everything there is to know, and are working behind the scenes though to stop the threats from continuing.

They just don't want to deal with an incensed populace just yet--those of us who seek out the truth between the lines so to speak aren't a large proportion of the US population.

I've had some of the same thoughts, but it seems increasingly silly to disavow the fact that Iraq was behind the attacks given the political situation in the country.

Since we have gone to war in Iraq, what better way to galvonize public opinion and support, than to provide all the information about Iraq. It just doesn't make sense to hold back, IMO.

I'm so convinced Iraq was behind the attacks, both 9/11 and the first WTC bombing, that it frustrates me to no end that we don't use the information we have.

The democrats would never hold public office again on a national leadership level, if we told people what we know, and also told people that the congressional leadership knew too as a result of their intelligence briefings.