To: CounterCounterCulture
Does anyone have a sense of whether the US Supremes will grant emergency certiorari in this case? Recall they turned down an appeal of the NJ Supremes.
127 posted on
09/15/2003 10:44:32 AM PDT by
mwl1
To: mwl1; Congressman Billybob
Your thoughts, Congressman??
132 posted on
09/15/2003 10:46:07 AM PDT by
MamaLucci
( Clinton met with Monica more than he did his CIA director.)
To: mwl1
there is a difference in this case from NJ...NJ was a state court...9th is a Federal...the USSC had BETTER be concerned about a Federal court...frankly, they should have no jurisdiction, it's a state matter. That might be their ticket out, they can void the 9th's ruling since it is a state matter. I know the 9th is involved since FEC gets involved, but that might be seen as weak in this case.
238 posted on
09/15/2003 11:00:32 AM PDT by
Keith
To: mwl1
See my comments on this thread. In 1976 I obtained one of these Emergency Orders to change the conditions (put McCarthy on the ballot as an independent candidate for President). This can be done. This will, I believe, be done.
John / Billybob
263 posted on
09/15/2003 11:04:39 AM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
(Everyone talks about Congress; I am doing something about it.)
To: mwl1
Based on that I would think that they would slap down the 9th on the grounds that this is a State matter and doesn't have standing in the Federal Court system.
272 posted on
09/15/2003 11:05:44 AM PDT by
Kadric
To: mwl1
This is different - the NJ SC is a state court - the 9th Circuit is a federal court, and SCOTUS has jurisdiction.
411 posted on
09/15/2003 11:28:21 AM PDT by
bootless
(Never Forget)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson