Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BOBTHENAILER; SAMWolf; DoctorZIn; McGavin999; Eala; AdmSmith; dixiechick2000; nuconvert; onyx; ...
Straw joins French and Germans in urging end to Iran's nuclear project

MARGARET NEIGHBOUR


JACK Straw, the Foreign Secretary, has joined with his French and German counterparts to urge the Iranian government to abandon its controversial nuclear fuel enrichment programme and accept tougher UN inspections.

British officials said the confidential letter sent in early August from Mr Straw, Dominique de Villepin and Joska Fischer to Iranian foreign minister Kamal Karrazi was intended to stress to Iran the seriousness of its position and the importance of it taking action.

Amid suggestions that the letter was sent in the face of opposition from Washington, the officials emphasised that the US authorities were aware of the letter before it was sent, and insisted that the UK and US shared the common objective of securing Iranian compliance with its obligations under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Nevertheless, the letter appeared to highlight a difference in tactics between the Bush administration, which has sought to isolate the Islamic regime, and the UK and European efforts to engage with Tehran.

In the letter, Mr Straw and his counterparts are reported to have urged Iran to sign, implement and ratify a protocol to the NPT that provides for intrusive inspections and to halt its uranium enrichment programme, which the West fears could be designed to produce nuclear weapons.

The letter is said to have raised the prospect of some cooperation on technology, without specifically pledging help with a civilian nuclear energy programme, if the Iranians come into compliance. British officials insisted that the letter was not offering a trade-off.

Article 4 of the NPT, they pointed out, affirms the right of treaty parties to develop civil nuclear programmes. Implicit in securing Iranian compliance with their NPT obligations, the officials argued, was a recognition of its right to develop a civil nuclear programme.

The treaty says that party countries are "entitled to participate in the fullest possible exchange of scientific information for ... the further development of the applications of atomic energy for peaceful purposes".

The letter was also "fully complimentary", officials argued, with the outcome of last week’s meeting of the governing board of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), which gave Tehran an ultimatum to prove by 31 October it has no secret weapons programme or be reported to the Security Council for possible sanctions. That outcome was endorsed by the US, the officials pointed out.

On 18 August, Iranian President Mohammad Khatami wrote to European leaders pledging that Iran would never divert its civilian nuclear programme for military purposes. It did not, however, commit Iran to sign or ratify the protocol.

A leading conservative cleric yesterday said that Iran should withdraw from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and should not consent to unfettered inspections of its nuclear facilities.

Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati said:

"North Korea withdrew from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Many countries have not even signed it. It would have been better if Iran had not signed it."

http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/international.cfm?id=1041052003
25 posted on 09/19/2003 9:18:20 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: DoctorZIn
Diplomat must wait for ruling on extradition

By John Steele

A senior Iranian diplomat arrested in Britain after the Argentinian Government alleged he was involved in a bombing is expected to hear within five weeks whether the Home Secretary will allow the extradition request to continue.

Hadi Soleimanpour, the former Iranian ambassador to Argentina, is wanted in connection with the car bombing of a Jewish community centre in Buenos Aires in 1994 that killed 85 people and left a further 100 injured.

Soleimanpour, who was ambassador in Buenos Aires at the time of the explosion but is now studying at Durham University, appeared before Bow Street magistrates' court yesterday in an extradition hearing.

His arrest last month caused a strain in relations between the British and Iranian governments.

Soleimanpour, 47, was released on bail by District Judge Christopher Pratt until Oct 23. His bail included a commitment of £500,000 from the Iranian Government; he must live either in the North or, when in London, in an Iran-financed flat; he must report daily to police; and he must not try to obtain travel documents.

James Hines, of the Crown Prosecution Service, acting for the Argentinian government, said that five weeks was needed for the consideration of 2,600 pages of evidence, delivered in the last few days from Argentina, by the Home Secretary.

David Blunkett must decide whether there is sufficient merit in the material to justify granting permission for the extradition case to continue in the British courts.

If Mr Blunkett decides against the Argentinian request, the case will fall. If he allows it to continue, lawyers for Soleimanpour, led by Alun Jones, QC, a leading extradition expert, will try to persuade the courts to throw out the Argentinian case.

Mr James said the 2,600 pages of evidence produced by the Argentinians were only "2,600 pages of background".

Protesters from the National Council of Resistance of Iran staged a demonstration outside the court.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/09/20/wiran120.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/09/20/ixnewstop.html




26 posted on 09/19/2003 10:25:14 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: F14 Pilot
The treaty says that party countries are "entitled to participate in the fullest possible exchange of scientific information for ... the further development of the applications of atomic energy for peaceful purposes".

On monday I will post an article from a paid energy subscription I get that shows Iran to claim a discovery well that proves linkage between two barely defined oil fields.

The gist of the article is that the new well confirms field recoverability of some 8-9 BILLION barrels of heavy crude oil from the fields.
That's right....8-9 BILLION Barrels!!!

THEY REALLY BEED THE NUKES FOR ELECTRICITY.....RRRRRRIIIIIIIIGHT.

29 posted on 09/20/2003 4:57:59 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson