[Argus]

how about that hate mail, huh?

I'm always intrigued when leftwingers invoke morality, as this worm does when he calls Bush and company "moral cretins". What constitutes morality for a liberal, besides being generous with other people's money? I thought they were relativists anyway - beyond outmoded conventional morality and moral judgments. Actually I do know the answer - leftists say anything they think will win.

[CasearianDaoist]

somebody besides Bush can analogize 9/11 (although Bush doesn’t analogize 9/11, he explicitly cites it, and for political gain). It's absolutely repulsive the way people like you lay curled at the feet of this wanna-be dictator (his own words, bespeaking dreams) and bark at the ones who question him and his policies. Don't even begin to think that American casualties in Iraq keep any of them up at night. For these monsters, it's a harvest of souls...or, monster food."

What an odd set of accusations, each one really projecting the accuser's internal world, each one so obviously of the mark:

Bush is not using 911 for political gain - he is trying to rouse and align a lazy nation. The people of this nation have 911 foremost in their mind. It would be irresponsible of Bush to ignore their concerns. It is the left that has seized on it for political gain, and the war and the nation be damned.

Bush has been quite gracious towards his critics. This notion of Bush curbing dissent, along the memes about Ashcroft somehow "destroyng the constitution," is such a strange complaint - almost an hallucination. Bush has never tried to quash criticism.

Bush obviously deeply suffers from the loss of our men and women fallen in this conflict. The left could care less about them and it is they who use them for political purposes, otherwise they have nothing but contempt for them. The troops obviously know that he feels for them. Clinton, on the other hand, seems incapable of an real, genuine emotions of any worth at all.

How strange the internal world of these people.