Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbyte12
not exactly sure if I would use the word "massaged"...i just plain think that there some dead wrong assumptions made about WMDs in Iraq. The NIE report sounds quite convincing and I'm sure that people in the administration wouldn't have pushed the WMD issue so hard before the war if they didn't really believe there was any there. I think this is more of a massive intelligence failure. What ticks me off is those that say that they should have pushed the human rights issue more before invading...those same people would have come back with the arguement that human rights are abuse all over the world.
13 posted on 09/24/2003 8:54:58 PM PDT by Txco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Txco
Ok so there are no weapons of mass destruction so WHY IN THE HELL did Saddam fight the inspections tooth and nail and why would he not allow the Scientists to be interviewed outside the country?? Have they really found NOTHING?
14 posted on 09/24/2003 9:18:26 PM PDT by edchambers (California Uberalles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson