Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second U.S. Judge Blocks 'Do-Not-Call' List
Fox News ^ | http://www.foxnews.com/

Posted on 09/25/2003 4:10:17 PM PDT by Hotdog

War of the laws?...whats next?


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: donotcalllist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 401-408 next last
To: tiamat
Glad you liked it. ;-D
201 posted on 09/25/2003 7:49:25 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Don Carlos
what's the purpose of a Congress

Umm, to keep fat alcoholics employed?

ROTFLMAO!!!! We can't all be like Ted Kennedy!!

202 posted on 09/25/2003 7:52:55 PM PDT by m1-lightning (- A Charge To Keep -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Oh I intend to use it!

Unless it's copyrighted! LOL!

kidding

Tia

203 posted on 09/25/2003 7:53:06 PM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Make it illegal for government, companies, etc. from selling our personal information

Privacy Act In Progress

204 posted on 09/25/2003 8:00:03 PM PDT by m1-lightning (- A Charge To Keep -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
As much as I dislike telemarketers, the judge might be right. I don't see how telemarketers can be singled out and let politicians and charities continue to call anyone they please with their solicitations.

This may all work out for the best. Given the way the public is screaming for the telemarketers' heads on spits, Congress may be forced to overcome the new ruling by passing a loophole-free version of the DNC law.

205 posted on 09/25/2003 8:04:00 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
I'm an original, and I give this stuff away. Enjoy! I'm really glad you liked it--;-D
206 posted on 09/25/2003 8:04:10 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
"…BUT telemarkerters do have to dial your number to activate a ringing tone and they leave misleading phone numbers…phones are a necessity…It's also an interuptance to have an incoming call much like if there were business that could make money off of causing an interuptance in your power or water. "

1) Just like telemarketers having to dial your number, CNN has to send out a signal
2) Who’s really more misleading about their motives, CNN or the latest mortgage broker?
3) Walking down the street’s also a necessity.
4) Answering someone while walking down the street is also and interuptance. Neither is as significant as an interruption in power or water.

207 posted on 09/25/2003 8:07:54 PM PDT by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: tiamat
The solution to that is to ban ALL of them! No more preferential treatment!

My guess is that Congress will do just that tomorrow, while grinding their molars down to the size of grape seeds, in order to save their political skins.

208 posted on 09/25/2003 8:08:40 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: m1-lightning
SEC. 103. CONSUMER OPPORTUNITY TO LIMIT SALE OR DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION.

SEC. 104. CONSUMER OPPORTUNITY TO LIMIT OTHER INFORMATION PRACTICES.

Ok, so this will give us power over people being able to sell our info (I was actually pondering Copyrighting myself).

I would MUCH rather tolerate telemarketing calls then have all these companies/government/people buying my name and data and PROFITING off it. That bothers me more.
209 posted on 09/25/2003 8:10:42 PM PDT by Calpernia (Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog
Maybe someone should publish the judges home and cell phone numbers, so the rest of us could exercize our right to free speech.
210 posted on 09/25/2003 8:10:57 PM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
steve-b wrote:

My guess is that Congress will do just that tomorrow, while grinding their molars down to the size of grape seeds, in order to save their political skins.

*************************************

And THAT is another bonus !

Politics is fun.

Tia

211 posted on 09/25/2003 8:13:01 PM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: rogator
It's already here...go for it
212 posted on 09/25/2003 8:13:59 PM PDT by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

Comment #213 Removed by Moderator

To: m1-lightning
Previously, companies had to have their own "do not call list" but it was hard to regulate when the company says "you never told us to put you on that list".

Especially when they evade such requests by Clintonian parsing (e.g. they interpret "take me off your list" as a request to be removed from the comapny's Do Not Call list) and by hanging up before you can finish the sentence "Place this number on your Do Not Call list."

214 posted on 09/25/2003 8:15:41 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog
Time to turn the lights out and un-plug the phones...need a good night sleep for tomorrow...thanks all...goodnight
215 posted on 09/25/2003 8:15:57 PM PDT by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog
Oh, bullshit.

No one's stopping the damned telemarketers from opening their mouths.

But I sure as hell don't have to let them say their piece on my damn telephone!!!!

216 posted on 09/25/2003 8:16:12 PM PDT by mhking (Why worry? Each one of us is carrying an unlicensed nuclear accelerator on his back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grayout
Your rented phone line, and your property are two different things

This is not a relevant distinction. Unwanted door-to-door peddlers are required to stay out of a rented apartment every bit as much as they are required to stay out of an owner-owned house.

217 posted on 09/25/2003 8:17:48 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Hotdog
Do we know who appointed (er, annoited) this jerk?

Or the previous one?
218 posted on 09/25/2003 8:21:12 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
500 S&W!


219 posted on 09/25/2003 8:25:11 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: hotpotato; Hotdog; Lady Composer
United States District Court for the District of Colorado ---Contact the U.S. District Court

Judge Edward W. Nottingham
Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse A1041 / Courtroom 14
(303) 844-5018

220 posted on 09/25/2003 8:28:36 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 401-408 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson