Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jagrmeister
The most recent gallup poll found that 31% of registered voters considered Arnold Schwarzenegger NOT CAPABLE of governing the state. I am one of those 31%. Given over 7 Million registered voters in California, that means that over 2 million people also think the man you suggest we vote for is not capable of being Governor.

ca·pa·ble adj
having capacity or ability; efficient and able
having the ability required for a specific task or accomplishment; qualified

I am tired of others trying to paint non-Arnold supporters as 'single issue voters' or telling me that Arnold represents 75% of what I want in a new Governor. The other night, I made a long list of the things that I like/don't like about Arnold. Frankly, other than star power and the ability to rally the press and raise money, I came up with nothing positive.

Notwithstanding a perceived lack of capability (by me and the rest of the 2 Million+ voters), his liberal social policies say one thing to me... he can't solve the fiscal problems of the state. Things like hydrogen highways and 'doing everything for the people' is what got this state into the problems it has now and is just as scary as Bustamante.

For months, Arnold supporters have spent their time brow-beating McClintock and his supporters with the 'Tom can't win' mantra. The Gallup poll demonstrates that wasn't true. If Arnold wanted my respect or vote, he should earn it. He hasn't done anything to garner support of loyal but concerned Republicans. Instead, he painted them as 'right wing crazies', said 'the public doesn't care about details', and continued to run to the left. I value my right to vote and do it with great thought. I also resent others telling me what to do with that vote.

On October 7th, I will not be voting for Arnold Schwarzenegger. If that results in a democrat being in office, perhaps next time the GOP leadership should take more care in selecting the candidates they back. They certainly have not represented most of the Republicans I know, who also find Arnold an unacceptable choice.

40 posted on 09/30/2003 4:43:44 AM PDT by calcowgirl (Right Wing Crazy #4052977)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl
does your long list of nothing positive about Arnold include his "Bill Clinton" background?

http://www.liberty-ca.org/recallgraydavis/swartzenegger.htm

The "30 year old" problems of Mr. Schwarzenegger are a lifelong history, similarly as was Clinton's "10 year old land deal" a lifetime of corruption.

Whether it is Schwarzenegger or Clinton who has the better experience at groping and otherwise sexually harrassing women seems a close tie, but it may be that Clinton was out of his league. Schwarzenegger may be the professional groper, and he may put Clinton's amateurish pants dropping and cigar tricks to shame.
43 posted on 09/30/2003 6:44:17 AM PDT by MoralValues.info
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson